NationStates Jolt Archive

Should we attack IRAQ?

10-01-2003, 12:54
Yes, bomb the bastard Hussain - but try to keep it accurate boys (especially the US forces) cos we don't want more friendly fire casualties or civilian deaths.
11-01-2003, 01:30
If they could hit just Saddam, he'd be dead for years. If they really wanted him dead.

One wonders, back then in 1991, why Gen. H. Norman Schwarzkopf wasn't allowed to remove Saddam, when Saddam was defeated and they had the chance to take him to court and get a new goverment for Iraq.

One really wonders.

So, what do you think will happen this time?


Besides, Iraq isn't the biggest threat by far, no matter what lies they tell on TV. North Korea is, they got nukes and have nothing to lose, so they are likely to use them. Still, you get told Iraq was the real threat. Yeah, sure.
And what became of public enemy #1, Usama Bin Ladin? Dubbaya seems to have forgotten he wanted him so badly for "trying to kill his dad".

:x What a pile of shit the US foreign policy has become...
11-01-2003, 01:58
Do I believe that the US should go to war simply because the idiot president and his keepers want to take everyones mind of how badly the messed up the economy, or rather, excuse me, how they made it worse by passing a tax cut aimed at the wealthy when Ragan already proved (however inadvertantly) that in times of recession(sp?) , the wealth do not spend extra money, they save it, therby hurting the economy?

No, clearly. If the US must go to war, let it be with North Korea, they are a far greater threat, though personally, I would prefer we did not go to war at all
11-01-2003, 02:01
yes. by exporting terrorism, iraq has attacked everyone directly & indirectly.
11-01-2003, 02:45
yes. by exporting terrorism, iraq has attacked everyone directly & indirectly.

So have the US of A. Now what? :?