NationStates Jolt Archive

Insert Namen Here

Description: Insert Description

1. Insert Object

1. ESTABLISHES the workers the right to the means of production.
a. (Object) are not required to pay wages of workers while they are on strike.
b. The members/employers of any organization may be changed at any time by either a direct 2/3rd vote of the organization, or a Public Representative.
c. Public Representatives are formed at any time by any group of persons by open ballot, and may be changed at any time.
d. In cases where the decisions of Public Representatives are in conflict, majority behind the Public Representatives wins by a 2/3rd vote.
e. Secret Ballot is abolished, changeable/subject to the above.
f. All votes will be made using methematical equations, subject/changeable as according to the above.
g. An international organization formed and managed in the above manner will seek efficiency in this mathematics, to develop psychology, and also detail the nature of all persons bottom-up, open to the public as determined by the public by a 2/3rd vote, or through Public Representatives.
h. Previous governments are abolished.
i. Voluntary education at any time is available on the above, subject to the above.
j. Everything is funded in the above manner.

Assuming that the labor act at vote passes, this would be considered an amendment to that act probably. Im not a mod so I dont know for sure. If it gets lumped into the amendment category, you'd have to repeal the first one and then re-write a new bill incorporating your ideas in to it.

WA Labor Relations Act II
(Yes, I did copy and paste part of this BS off of Hiriaurtung Arororugul,
And without asking permission first. And no, you can't have permission.
it is lulzy.
It is not.
I don't think he'll mind.
You were wrong.
Co-author him.
No.
Do it for the lulz.)
If this was even remotely funny I would laugh right along with you and we'd turn it into an outlandish 'roleplay' involving zombies, or robots, or something. But, um, it isn't funny.

I chose option 1 in your poll.

<snip>


You be a moronic, self-centered, half-witted piss ant. Ought to be ashamed of such atrocities, and rode out of this building on a rail. To blatantly steal, yes I said steal, from another author's resolution without asking in plagarism, and is shunned within these halls to the highest degree. You do yourself no credit here, and I should hope you leave and n'er return.

And without asking permission first. And no, you can't have permission.
Oh well, it can be edited to the point of not resembling. I simply thought copying and pasting and editing a union related act so as to make it look socialist, and myself look like a hack, is rediculous/funny. Nor would I attempt to pass it off as my own. Your bill is still freshly stickied. Anyone who reads this will read yours and see I'm full of shit, and if they didn't, I would point it out. I would not attempt to pass it into the WA that way. Nothing I can do to change the topic name, though.

Am I the only one that sees turning a Union Act into a Socialist Act funny? You know, parody? You really think I was attempting to build myself up using you, while your act is still being passed, while pointing it out, while looking like a jackass?

If this was even remotely funny I would laugh right along with you and we'd turn it into an outlandish 'roleplay' involving zombies, or robots, or something. But, um, it isn't funny.
Oh no, I'm serious. I was only joking about parodying you. It can still be developed.

To blatantly steal, yes I said steal, from another author's resolution without asking in plagarism, and is shunned within these halls to the highest degree. You do yourself no credit here, and I should hope you leave and n'er return.
I pointed out that it was blatant plagarism, and who it came from. I don't care about crediting myself. If it were to get to the WA, edited the point of not resembling Aroro's, don't put my name on it. I don't care.

Oh well, it can be edited to the point of not resembling. I simply thought copying and pasting and editing a union related act so as to make it look socialist, and myself look like a hack, is rediculous/funny.
To be a hack, "a literary or journalistic drudge" according to Chambers, being able to write would be a good start.

I defined it at answers.com

Am I the only one that sees turning a Union Act into a Socialist Act funny?

Apparently, yes you are the only one who finds proposal stealing funny.

Am I the only one that sees turning a Union Act into a Socialist Act funny? You know, parody? You really think I was attempting to build myself up using you, while your act is still being passed, while pointing it out, while looking like a jackass?

Yes. It's stealing from the hard work of someone else, butchering it in a way that would make even Carrot Top cringe at how bad the comedy is, and then acting like it should be passed.

This entire thing is just poorly done.

Yeah, alright.

We cannot but be dismayed at the ignorant carping and insulting antics of the respected delegation of Triniteras.

We do not always find ourselves in absolute and complete agreement with the Noble General Arororugul, but on this occasion we must associate ourselves with the esteemed Ambassador's words.

This pretence of a statute is pointless and incoherent. What is the justification for wasting this organisation's time with this ? And on what basis does the respected Ambassador for Triniteras address their insults and plagiarism to the esteemed Ambassador of our Neighbours with the epithet "Aroro" ?

Disrespect begets dishonour, the respected Ambassador for Triniteras would do well to remember that.


Yours,

Anyway, even without the fact that it's plagiarism, this proposal is clearly illegal under the rule against ideological bans...