Should the WA have a president?
Rick Roll Land
13-04-2009, 16:51
Let me know what you think. I really don't care as long as he/she would be someone who makes time to know WA members.
Hiriaurtung Arororugul
13-04-2009, 16:54
Let me know what you think. I really don't care as long as he/she would be someone who makes time to know WA members.
OOC: "Never gonna give you up, never gonna let you down...":D
IC: No.
Raz-Griz
13-04-2009, 16:58
Hm...um....NO
Omigodtheykilledkenny
13-04-2009, 17:09
OOC: I thought Rick Roll Land was Yelda? :confused:
IC: We don't need a president; we already have a secretary-general (www.nswiki.net/index.php?title=Catherine_Gratwick). And I fear what she would do to this new president if we tried to appoint one in her place.
OOC: I thought Rick Roll Land was Yelda? :confused:
That was Rickroll AO, or something like that. It CTEed.
Ardchoille
14-04-2009, 13:56
Let me know what you think. I really don't care as long as he/she would be someone who makes time to know WA members.
The Secretariat has already made time to know far, far more about WA members than they would be comfortable with knowing it knows, if they knew.
-- Dicey Reilly, Wrongfully President for Life of Ardchoille
and Occasional Acting chairman of committees pro tem every now and then when not otherwise occupied or when unable to find a sufficiently good excuse to duck the job