NationStates Jolt Archive

Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: NoIamyourfather

AFFERMING the sovereign rights of all nations

REFERRING TO the nations own rights to administer justice how they feel necessary and proper

STRONGLY CONDEMNS World Assembly Resolution 13, the World Assembly Hereby

1. Declares Resolution 13 to be nul and void

2. Emphasizes the sovereignty of every nation

3. Allows the nation states to set their own judicial standards, for which trials and the rights of the accused would be set

4. Condemns any action by an international body to enact an Universal Judiciary System

5. Noting that any Universal Judiciary System would be a direct violation of a nations right to self governance

6. Invites all nations to abandon the set system from Resolution 13, and form their own system

7. Further Regrets ever infringing on the rights of the sovereign nations in this body, by passing Resolution 13

8. Calls upon all nations to respect the rights of sovereignty and to allow the nations to practice whatever type of judiciary measures desired.

9. Further State that the World Assembly is not a Tyrannical body, and has no right telling nations how to govern them selfs.

3. Allows the nation states to set their own judicial standards, for witch trials and the rights of the accused would be set

In the Name of the Eternal Kawaii, may the Cute One be praised

We find this proposal intriguing. We have found that other nation states have frowned upon the judicial standards our nation sets for trials of those accused of witchcraft. It is refreshing to hear that the National Sovereignity movement is willing to embrace this issue.

Might want to look at the Rules for WA Proposals (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=420465) before going any further.

There's no such category as "National Sovereignty", you can't repeal prior proposals except via Repeals, and most of the rest of your thoughts are in direct contradiction to already passed legislation. In short, there's not much of anything legal or salvageable from this proposal.

Further State that the World Assembly is not a Tyrannical body, and has no right telling nations how to govern them selfs.
I think you'll find that this statement is out and out false. The WA is most certainly a tyrannical body, and it has every right to tell nations anything it wants. You agreed to that when you signed up.

Also probably illegal for "new legislation within a repeal", but now I'm just being mean.

Also probably illegal for "new legislation within a repeal", but now I'm just being mean.

It's not a repeal.
Category: National Sovereignty
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: NoIamyourfather
The rule broken here is "repeal in a regular proposal".

Its not a reapeal, but a new resolution. That is how an international body works. To counter a reolution, one must pass a new one, and If you would like I will chage the catigory to human rights.

Its not a reapeal, but a new resolution. That is how an international body works.

That may be how it works elsewhere, but here in NationStates we follow the game rules, which don't work that way at all.

I already posted a link to them. I suggest you read them thoroughly.

Again, I am not repealing resolution 13, but replacing it with a new resolution

Again, I am not repealing resolution 13, but replacing it with a new resolution

Again, listen to a WA Moderator who manages the rules of the game, and read why we don't allow amendments or replacements (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12817207&postcount=7).

If you manage to post this despite my repeated statements not to, expect it to be deleted and a warning attached to your nation. I'm being nice here. Don't blow me off.


.

i all rady posted it, before your warnings

He meant don't post it on the Proposals List. You don't even have enough endorsements to do that. Lucky too, you don't need to start accruing moderator warnings so early.