Ban child soldiers.
The Empire of Roef.
Scottish empire.
Step one: Ban child soldiers! They dont want to fight when they become 8 or 9 right?
Step two: Open this proposal at the WA
step three: vote yes! ban child soldiers!
WHY?
Because, if you send in a army of 1000 10 year old, they die for sure, and they wont kill anybody. So you lose 1000 but win 0. i think we shoud ban this evil act! ban the uses of child at the army!
Wierd Anarchists
26-07-2008, 15:12
I do agree on this with you totally, but I do think it is not a proposal now.
Wish you success in writing a good proposal on this. I can give comments, but my English is so bad that I cannot write proposals myself.
Greetings,
Cocoamok
WA delegate for Intelligentsia Islands
Flibbleites
26-07-2008, 15:36
It's been done already, check clause C of Restrictions on Child Labor (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=13835666&postcount=6).
Bob Flibble
WA Representative
O right, but i think we need to say it again. So everybody knows, not every member of the WA did read all things passed right?
Frisbeeteria
26-07-2008, 16:01
Wrong. Per the WA proposal rules, we don't allow duplication.
Roef, I can see that you're really trying hard, but if you want to participate you must read (at minimum) the Rules sticky and some of the Passed Resolutions.
You're not going to pass something like your original post. It's illegal and has no content. Please study a bit before trying again.
~ Frisbeeteria ~
NationStates Game Moderator
The One-Stop Rules Shop
Rules For WA Proposals
But child soldiers are wrong! Everybody know that!
Cobdenistan
26-07-2008, 16:33
Which is why they're already banned...
Right, that i am happy. I just want to ban this, and if it is done, i am real happy. Thank you all for your time.
The Uprising Nation
27-07-2008, 05:43
Why not train the next generation army at a young age but the age limit should be 15 and up and i would would vote no just because i'm a dictator and i have no time to waste on a criminal 17 year old when i could train my army at a younger age about 13 though 16 and the older men need to have a clean background but since i look out for people if they don't want to join the army then i personly put them in forceably.
If this is already banned, maybe ban child labor instead?
Why not train the next generation army at a young age but the age limit should be 15 and up and i would would vote no just because i'm a dictator and i have no time to waste on a criminal 17 year old when i could train my army at a younger age about 13 though 16 and the older men need to have a clean background but since i look out for people if they don't want to join the army then i personly put them in forceably.
Being a dictator dont means that you shoud set 13 year old, with a mp40, to fight at your front! I say, atleast about 18 years. I mean, what woud you do, you just become 13, your mom made you a cake, than a general of the army came, eated your cake, and took you with him. After 3 hours driving, he stops.
He takes you to a army base, gives you a mp40 with 200 bullets, and the next morning, you are on a plane, going to any nation, and just attack there!
Gobbannaen WA Mission
28-07-2008, 00:18
If this is already banned, maybe ban child labor instead?
It's the resolution banning child labour that bans child soldiers.
Cobdenistan
28-07-2008, 01:44
If this is already banned, maybe ban child labor instead?
What a excellent idea; perhaps next you'll suggest a resolution that establishes a headquarters for the WA, or ensure safety in the workplace!