NationStates Jolt Archive


Repealing "Rights of Minorities and Women"

Dyelli Beybi
20-11-2007, 07:05
Dyelli Beybi is appalled by the repealing of UN Resolution 80 by UN Resolution 228. Firstly, UN Resolution 228 is crippled by the omission of articles and prepositions, however on top of this, the author of Resolution 228 seems unaware of the real position of the UN to enforce it's resolutions.

We wish to draw attention to the criticism of the use of the word 'should' that the author of Resolution 228 has boldly declared, with a singular ability to leave out articles, is "not strong word." The Nation of Dyelli Beybi would argue that far from being "not strong word", 'should' is a word which reinforces the guiding role of the United Nations without subverting the sovereign authority of the Nation State. Furthermore the criticism of the lack of definition of words such as 'better' is mind blowing. While it is probably assumed that such words are part of the vocabulary of most English speakers, it can also be easily be looked up in a dictionary if like the author of Resolution 228, you fail to understand. Will we soon be striking of resolutions for failing to define the word 'the'?

UN Resolution 228 is a farce which should never have been passed. Dyelli Beybi can only hope that in the future a Resolution is passed that effectively reinstates the essence of Resolution 80.
Iron Felix
20-11-2007, 07:22
Dyelli Beybi can only hope that in the future a Resolution is passed that effectively reinstates the essence of Resolution 80.
Well then, it is your lucky day. Such a resolution is being drafted even as we speak. (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=542690)

SchutteGod's replacement will reinstate the essence of Resolution 80 without all of the flaws of Resolution 80, such as the fact that it didn't do anything.

Felix Edmundovich Dzerzhinsky
Chairman, Yeldan Committee For State Security