NationStates Jolt Archive

Plase support my Space Exploration Act because it is good for the science and what is good for the science is good for the mankind:-)

It's always a good idea to post the text of the proposal here before you submit it.


I'll play the good guy today....


Support the space exploration
A resolution to promote funding and the development of education and the arts.

Category: Education and Creativity
Area of Effect: Educational
Proposed by: UBkistan

Description: I propose a joint venture being aimed at a peaceful exploration and explorations of the outer space.
1. I think that the international community should increase involving in construction long-range space probes.
2. I think that before the end of this decade the mankind should send the man to Mars and enable his safe return to Earth.
3. The entire international community should participate in the structure of more efficient and better Ion engines. So in the more distant future which colonization of different star systems will enable the mankind for example Alpha Centauri.
4. Proposes to make the outer space available to ordinary civilians involving old men, children, and teenagers into it etc. Data won over in this way can be fundamental to a colonization of the outer space.


I ask the UN and the international community for supporting this resolution. I ask the certain very important truth about the life “who isn’t going forward the one is moving back”.

I'd suggest the good ambassador to study the following very illustrative literature:

Rules For UN Proposals (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=420465)
The United Nations Reference Guide (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=490188)
Silly and/or Illegal Proposals. zOMG! (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=397276)
Passed N.S.U.N. Resolutions (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=357572).

This should give a clear idea of what to do and what not to do in proposal.

I would further suggest to post proposals here before submitting them for delegate approval. This usually helps solving problems and improving the quality of the proposal.

Perhaps it is just a provocation... but what for we, the people of Elven Realm, do not know...
No further comment necessery...

Now that I have time to actually comment on this. I have only one.


I'm pritty sure that this is a textbook Branding Violation.

Now that I have time to actually comment on this. I have only one.


I'm pritty sure that this is a textbook Branding Violation.

Yeppers, it is.

I'm pritty sure that this is a textbook Branding Violation.Yeppers, it is.

I must be reading the wrong textbook then.

I can see a case being made for Real World reference, Category, Empty Rhetoric, and (unfortunately not on the Illegal list) Bad Science; but the only think that looks remotely like Branding is the use of first person singular. That's not illegal, just poor form.

I must be reading the wrong textbook then.

I can see a case being made for Real World reference, Category, Empty Rhetoric, and (unfortunately not on the Illegal list) Bad Science; but the only think that looks remotely like Branding is the use of first person singular. That's not illegal, just poor form.

*realizes he is reading The Communist Manifesto*

Ah, right. I haven't quite got the rules memorized.

And, yeah, Empty Rhetoric should be in the rules. :P

And, yeah, Empty Rhetoric should be in the rules. :P
First paragraph.
UN Proposals are attempts to introduce new legislation to member nations. By submitting a Proposal, you are stating that you have found something in the NS world that needs to be addressed and you are attempting to do so by forcing a change to all members. For this reason, UN Proposals must be more than just rhetoric. While they need not be written like "real" UN documents, they do need to be more than just your opinion. Essays belong in the General Forum (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=1227), or the Serious Discussions Forum (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=1038), not the UN floor.

It's Bad Science that isn't in the rules.

I agree with UBkistan space exploration is just what NS needs think of all that could come out of this one very important issue.

I agree with UBkistan space exploration is just what NS needs think of all that could come out of this one very important issue.Well there may not be little green or grey big black eyed creatures out there in space but if you look around the membership of the UN you will see many nations present that live in space and have for many years explored it.

Now on the proposal:


1. I think that the international community should increase involving in construction long-range space probes. Those of us that live in space want traffic reduced not increased so this will not go over well.

2. I think that before the end of this decade the mankind should send the man to Mars and enable his safe return to Earth.We have regular flights to Mars all you need to do is contact our National Travel Agency to arrange a visit to it and many other planets beyond your own.

3. The entire international community should participate in the structure of more efficient and better Ion engines. So in the more distant future which colonization of different star systems will enable the mankind for example Alpha Centauri.Many have given these slow outdated engines up and use safer faster more effective engines that give off less polutions. Also many have moved beyond Alpha and are some place out around Orion and Omega looking at Zelda.

4. Proposes to make the outer space available to ordinary civilians involving old men, children, and teenagers into it etc. Data won over in this way can be fundamental to a colonization of the outer space.Today you can go to many planets that are already settled for about what it might require and cost in some places to cross the street to another nations cities.

Then also many nations that live in space don't want anyone dropping in on them and will take action against any invaders who might come knocking on their planets surface.

Also is it just me or do you not want women in space... as in two you say man to Mars then in four mention old men, children, and teenagers. What is this to be a haven for pedofiles or dirty old men and children and teenagers..?

Plase support my Space Exploration Act because it is good for the science and what is good for the science is good for the mankind:-)

like mustard gas?

Also is it just me or do you not want women in space... as in two you say man to Mars then in four mention old men, children, and teenagers. What is this to be a haven for pedofiles or dirty old men and children and teenagers..?

Actually the first mention of "man" is the general reference to mankind. However as for the second reference to old men, I think he meant that we should work towards being able to not just send the young and healthy, but also the very young and old, but I can't be sure....

like mustard gas?
You forget about A-Bomb and H-Bomb:-)