NationStates Jolt Archive

These bill is for protection for every non-human organism in the animal kingdom(except were it says it includes humans).

article 1, use of animals in drug testing. When a animal is used in drug testing, it must be DRUG TESTING, learning how to use MINOR medical nano technology(minor as not so dangerise), or finding out how to replace a organ, and not require genitally/physically altering the animals body, unless its like replacing a organ. Animals MUST be given there psychological and psychical needs. Animal testers must treat the animals with respect. MUST minimize the amount of animals, AND FORCED JAIL TIME HUMANS used in testing as much as possible(these sentience includes humans). MUST also, minimize the amount of pain taken from the animals and humans as much as possible(with permission from the human if it is a human)(these sentience includes humans). The steps of which tests on humans and animals are done is bellow(these sentience includes humans along with the steps bellow).

level of intensity: minor, minor-med, med, med-high, high-extreme, extreme

1. computer modeling.
2. as many other effective alternatives.
3. minor human(VOLUNTEER and a small amount of FORCED JAIL TIME) and minor animal tests using stem cells if fails go back to step 1.
4. computer modeling
5. as many other effective alternatives
6. miner-med human(VOLUNTEER and a small amount of FORCED JAIL TIME) and minor-med animal tests using stem cells if fails go back to step 4.
7. computer modeling
8. as many other effective alternatives
9. med human(VOLUNTEER and a intermediate amount of FORCED JAIL TIME) and med animal tests using stem cells if fails go back to step 7.
10. computer modeling
11. as many other effective alternatives
12. med-high human(VOLUNTEER and a intermediate-high amount of FORCED JAIL TIME) and med animal tests using stem cells if fails go back to step 10.
13. computer modeling
14. as many other effective alternatives
15. high human(VOLUNTEER and a high amount of FORCED JAIL TIME) if fails go back to step 13.
16. computer modeling
17. as many other effective alternatives
18. high-extreme human(VOLUNTEER and a extreme amount of FORCED JAIL TIME) and a extremely small amount of extreme animal tests if fails go back to step 16.
19. computer modeling
20. as many other effective alternatives
21. extreme human(VOLUNTEER and a extreme amount of FORCED JAIL TIME) if fails go back to step 19.

article 2, use of animals in social programs and government uses. As long as the animals are given there psychological and psychical needs it is perfectly fine for social services and animals may not be put at a too high risk in government uses like police dogs cant try to kill someone with a gun. Also animals must be treated with respect.

article 3, use of animals as food, or using animal byproduct's. When in a farm there psychological and psychical needs must be meet and you may not genetically alter there DNA. May not be torchered. Animals MUST BE KILLED QUICKLY AND PAINLESSLY. Animals must be treated with respect. Also eating meat and animal byproduct's is discouraged and is taxed serverly(a 47% sales tax rate and tax refunds are given to vegetarians and even bigger ones to vegans).


article 4, hunting. Hunting is not a sport or used to keep population down(we put birth control pills in there water to control population). Hunters must eat ALL THE MEAT THEY KILL AND KILL ANIMALS QUICK AND PAINLESSLY. also only 156 animals may be killed by one person in a year.

article 5, killing for other reasons. Animals may not be killed for any other reason. animals may not be torchered. Also animals must be treated with respect.

article 6, animals doing crimes. When a animal dose a crime they cant simply be put into a cage, there needs must be meet and must be trained to never do the crime again.

Anything violating article 1, 3, 4, or 5 is punishable by life in prison and/or forced jail time high(or worse) human testing for 4 years or more, depending on the decision made by court. Anything violating article 2 and 6 is punishable by house arrest for 5 years and/or jail for 2.5 years and/or forced jail time minor(or worse up to med) human testing, depending on the decision made by court. Also respect is different, it is punishable by minor(or worse up to minor-med) forced jail time human testing and/or or 2-7 years of house arrest, depending on the decision made by court.

authored by The United Socialist States of ROFLOLMAO LAND.

category:Environment effect:strong

ps:I am currently unsure of the category please help me out.

I can only support this if the maximum number of animals that can be killed is changed to 156.

"miner" should be "minor"

anything else to say?

isn't this over the character limit for proposals? think it's 3500ish, i've got the resolution at 4200ish.

its under it but barly.

We unexpectedly find a use for the resolution Unnecessary Animal Cruelty (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12864236&postcount=216), in that this syntactically awful proposition appears to overlap with it sufficiently to be illegal.

We unexpectedly find a use for the resolution Unnecessary Animal Cruelty (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12864236&postcount=216), in that this syntactically awful proposition appears to overlap with it sufficiently to be illegal.

I was about to point that out.

Rewrite it so it's legible.

These bill is for protection for every non-human organism in the animal kingdom(except were it says it includes humans).


We now are glad we are not in UN as we don't consider ourselves animal or human and know of many nations that are members who are not animal or human. So is this realy an effective measure when many don't fit into it. Being neither animal or human.

Also why is the NSUN going to waste time working on giving rights to non-human organisms when it has yet to give rights to all the human organisms in this NS world.

This is one more reason for us not joining the UN as it seems to waste a lot of time dealing with issues that don't effect the full membership and only deals with a small few....

Vice Minister of Social Order
Hollier Thanthou, QSS, ERP, SST, VDD
Nineth Generation Dwarf Clone


We find that setting a number per animal for kills is not something that could be done by the NSUN with one number fits all. As each individual animal will need a limit set based on how many of those are living this one number fits all might violate some conservation laws on endangers species that ban all killing of that animal.. here is sets it to one for all and mentions nothing of the animals status as far as any endangered lists or laws.

Also to think one has to eat what they kill... Have you ever tasted Cavirrian Skunk al la.... yet one must kill the little pests to preserve sanity in this nation... or anywhere one finds these skunks...

Killem Plenty,
Minister of Gaming Cavirra
CEO Cavirain Rifle Society


Are we running a beauty contest here or what as see 'computer modeling' and can only wonder what it is. Do they wear nothing or a two or one piece keyboard when they model...?

Showem Boobies,
Mistress of Fame

computer modeling sumulates the body of the organism with adding something like acid... to there lets say liver... and shows how it affects them

Rewrite it so it's legible.Or don't, as it is duplicative to the point of being illegal. And no legibility is going to fix that.

We now are glad we are not in UN ... We find that setting a number per animal for kills is not something that could be done by the NSUN with one number fits all. There are plenty of UN members that would agree with you. And some of us are fluffy.

Leetha Talone
Rational fluffy and
UN Ambassador

There are plenty of UN members that would agree with you. And some of us are fluffy.

Leetha Talone
Rational fluffy and
UN Ambassador

We had more to say about this but our steaks were done and getting cold and the beer flat so we had to leave. We are in the effort of convencing our National Council to vote on joining but they tend to move from that as they don't trust the UN and it's agenda... as they see it of one Nation Under one rule... the UN...

Harda Assuma,
Commander Cavirrian Latrine Brigade

Animals have zero rights, unless considered protected by the Seperate State. Animals are meant to be hunted, raised and killed for food. If 156 animals are to only be killed by one person, per year, Then there could be a major meat shortage and/or monopolization of the meat processing industry by non-member states.

In short words, I disagree.

Animals have zero rights, unless considered protected by the Seperate State. Animals are meant to be hunted, raised and killed for food. If 156 animals are to only be killed by one person, per year, Then there could be a major meat shortage and/or monopolization of the meat processing industry by non-member states.

In short words, I disagree.


I agree. Regulation needs to fit the specific cultural, economical, and agrocultural reporcusions.

Well, United Anacreon has headcrabs and we don't want them to stay alive:sniper:

Ok this "proposal" of animal rights and crap is so freakin retarded! who cares if animals get tested on? I'd rather it be them than me. And as for the testing on humans that have forced jail time, I can agree with that but with limtations to it. THe limitations being the only humans that are forced jail time and can be tested on are the ones on Death Row. B/c hell, they're gonna die anyways, right?

Well, United Anacreon has headcrabs and we don't want them to stay alive:sniper:


Careful here if you kill it you have to eat it.... under this one....

Ok this "proposal" of animal rights and crap is so freakin retarded! who cares if animals get tested on? I'd rather it be them than me. And as for the testing on humans that have forced jail time, I can agree with that but with limtations to it. THe limitations being the only humans that are forced jail time and can be tested on are the ones on Death Row. B/c hell, they're gonna die anyways, right?

who are we to say animals are less imporntent then us?

Animals have zero rights, unless considered protected by the Seperate State. Animals are meant to be hunted, raised and killed for food. If 156 animals are to only be killed by one person, per year, Then there could be a major meat shortage and/or monopolization of the meat processing industry by non-member states.

In short words, I disagree.

simple DONT EAT MEAT.