NationStates Jolt Archive

I propose a resolution that would Change the world as we know it. Third world countries of the world will flourish in every way. It will raise wages in those countries also help those regions become self sufficient and join the first world. While the third world cost of living rises, Employment will rise in the developed world. Those job that were being sent to the third world will stay in there own country because the expense of starting new divisions in the developing countries will make it economically inviable. Since they will have to pay the same wages in both places, Those jobs will stay in their native country.

To curve the inflation of the price of goods We need free trade. Free trade will decrease the expense of shipping good for businesses, That will decrease the impact of higher wages on businesses, people will have more money to spend so money will go back into businesses so they can expand and create more jobs.

Now to pay for this every country in the U.N will have to pay dues. This due will be determined in another proposal if this one passes, but I insist that the due should be a percent of the countries GDP with a cap, because wealthy countries should not be punished for being successful. Countries who want help will need to be apart of the U.N and need to be audited by the U.N. Countries who don't want to be apart of the U.N will not be able to enjoy free trade and will have heavy tariffs when trading with U.N sponsored countries. This will hopefully will convince these countries to become part of the U.N and that will add to the number of countries paying for my proposal.

I need some endorsements and constructive criticism.

Thank you

So what exactly are you proposing? Free trade? If a country needs financial help then what do they have to trade with me? Happinezz refuses to subsidise someone else's economy, just because they feel that the government should pay for cold and flu tablets. We are trying to drag our economy out of the gutter without assistance, we'll be damned if we're going to pay for an imploded economy as well.

Happinezz votes "NO", as it stands. It does require work though.

I need some endorsements and constructive criticism.Right now you have an outline/brainstorming session. You'll need to post something resembling a Proposal before anyone can do much.

Now to pay for this every country in the U.N will have to pay dues. This due will be determined in another proposal if this one passes, but I insist that the due should be a percent of the countries GDP with a cap, because wealthy countries should not be punished for being successful.
Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't we just try to do this? Or something rather much like it? It seems to me like what you're suggesting doing is combining two proposals that have already been presented but not passed and adding a third idea of your own in the hopes that it in and of itself will be able to carry the others. The main problem I see with this is that such a proposal would be too long to be legal, for if it were reduced to legal limits, it would be too compressed to do much good.

Also, I concur with The Most Glorious Hack. You should come up with an actual proposal if you intend to get anywhere. There isn't much you can get from us without one. Now, if the problem, as you've suggested, is that you lack the endorsements to submit a proposal on your own, you CAN ask for the assistance of another nation that does have the requisite endorsements in as far as submission is concerned. If you need help drafting a proposal, you can also request that someone co-write it with you. Before the general public here can be of much help to you, however, you do need an actual formatted proposal rather than a bunch of meaningful rhetoric.

http://test256.free.fr/UN%20Cards/red.jpg (hmm this *is* pretty cool...)

I believe this proposal will actually have a negative effect. First we'll deprive 3rd world countries of jobs (why hire illiterate third worlders when you can hire people who share your ethnicity and views, and also help your countries economy?!), and then eat all their savings with inflation (historically free trade increased inflation more often than curbed it). and all this at our own expense.

I actually think that if we make people pay for each proposal individually, we'll have much less problems with getting funding.

For a wonder, I agree with the Ambassador of Login Name. You seem to be intent on taking a resolution which sadly failed and coupling to an ideological stand guaranteed to annoy half of the previous resolution's supporters. It's a non-starter.

For a wonder, I agree with the Ambassador of Login Name. You seem to be intent on taking a resolution which sadly failed and coupling to an ideological stand guaranteed to annoy half of the previous resolution's supporters. It's a non-starter.

Hear Hear!!
The greatest lie of the 20th/21st century is that free trade is the panacea for all the worlds ills. When the truth is thats its the main cause of inequality in the global marketplace. The rich get richer, the poor gets spiraling inflation, no public services and civil war!