NationStates Jolt Archive


UN Bio Agent Convention

Bonisia
20-03-2007, 21:57
Recently the nation of Kivistan UN Bordello issued a proposal (which passed) that, among other things, denied ALL production of chemical weapons. I think that chemical weapons can be used as a bad thing, but they shouldn't be illegal to make. I think they shouldn't be illegal to have and make because not all nations are in the UN, this means they can have and make chemical weapons, chemical weapons that can be used against UN nations. So, I propose that this "In Queue Resolution" be shut down in voting and a new proposal be made with the same properties as the old one, but with a new clause stating that the UN can grant certain countries the ability to make chemical weapons for the defense of the UN and its members. This would kind of be like the US's emergency stockpiles of nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, etc. Thank you for your time.

Please endorse this idea and my country.
Cluichstan
20-03-2007, 22:01
Methinks you've confused bio-weapons with chemical weapons. Try reading the proposal again.

Respectfully,
Sheik Nadnerb bin Cluich
Cluichstani Ambassador to the UN
Bonisia
20-03-2007, 22:40
oops sry
That was an accident, but all the same this could apply to any and all sorts of weapons. Besides, some bio weapons do use chemicals.
Bahgum
20-03-2007, 22:44
oops sry
That was an accident, but all the same this could apply to any and all sorts of weapons. Besides, some bio weapons do use chemicals.

so does washing up powder
Seabear70
20-03-2007, 23:32
You're not real clear on what bio weapons are or do, are you.

Imagine this....

http://www.rotary5440.org/fortcollinsco/dhf4.gif

Happening to everyone with polish genetics in them.

Everywhere.

And being unable to stop it.

I would allow open nuke warefare before I would vote to allow anyone to persue bio weapons.
Ithania
21-03-2007, 00:34
We fail to see the need for biological weapons; our fusion warheads are more than enough to meet our requirements.

As a tactical weapon we have no use for these due to their delayed nature and in strategic use we believe our own personnel or innocent civilians could suffer inexcusable detrimental effects due to the volatile and unpredictable nature of biological weapons.

We will be firmly in favour when this reaches the floor, the use of extreme suffering and totally uncontrollable nature of these weapons makes them a force no nation should be permitted to meddle with in our view.

Besides, some bio weapons do use chemicals.

OOC: I don’t know much about biological weapons but isn’t “chemical” completely excluded in the definition of “biological”? [/OOC]

Anravelle Kramer,
UN Ambassador,
Ice Queendom of Ithania.
Blue Dinosaurs
21-03-2007, 00:45
IMO, bio-weapons are second only to asteroid strikes in their ability to end life as we know it. They are very different from chemical weapons.
Seabear70
21-03-2007, 00:48
IMO, bio-weapons are second only to asteroid strikes in their ability to end life as we know it. They are very different from chemical weapons.

As much as I'd love to comment on a dinosaur commenting on asteroid strikes, I won't.

I do however agree with you, though I would probably debate the order.
Omigodtheykilledkenny
21-03-2007, 04:13
We should probably sticky Kiv's thread (unless he wants a new one) and lock this one.
Cluichstan
21-03-2007, 04:54
As a tactical weapon we have no use for these due to their delayed nature and in strategic use we believe our own personnel or innocent civilians could suffer inexcusable detrimental effects due to the volatile and unpredictable nature of biological weapons.

There is no possible tactical use use of biological weapons.

Cordially,
Sheik Nottap bin Cluich
Cluichstani Defense Minister

P.S. If the Ithanian people would like to learn more about issues like this, they might consider joining UN DEFCON (http://s15.invisionfree.com/UN_DEFCON).

OOC: Kenny's right. This crap needs to be locked, and Kiv's thread stickied (IMNSHO ;) ).
Flibbleites
21-03-2007, 05:51
OOC: Kenny's right. This crap needs to be locked, and Kiv's thread stickied (IMNSHO ;) ).

OOC: Kiv's thread has at least been bumped.
MadBadgerStan
21-03-2007, 15:00
MadBadgerStan is horrified at the latest UN proposal!

How else are we to wipe out the evil Biotopian army's who are currently attacking our country with Bio-Weapons designed to kill our national animal the Badger if we can't strike back with Bio-weapons designed specifically to kill there soldiers and members of government?

Our Bio-weapons are the most advanced in the world, They attack the DNA turning the enemy into the Badgers they are attempting to kill!

MadBadgerStan will still use these weapons even if this proposal is put forward! We rely on Chemical and Biological WMDs as they are less damaging to our country when testing, than Nuclear weapons! we only need to kidnap a few hundred enemies who are then put into our testing facility's and then the Badger reserves after.

Another note is that if this resolution goes through thousands of workers will be put out of jobs and hundreds of soldiers will be traumatized after having to shoot all our test subjects we have in our labs, kidnapped from surrounding regions! Please think of the Soldiers!



-Max 'Killer' Jackson - Head of MadBadgerStan National Security.
Cluichstan
21-03-2007, 15:03
Oh FFS! Mods, can you PLEASE lock this already? The window-lickers are starting to come out to play.
The Most Glorious Hack
21-03-2007, 16:53
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v251/Tindalos/UN/lock.jpg