conter terrorism intitiative: AMENDMENT
I believe a terrorist attack should be redefined as a attack by a non military or para military organization directed against civilian, goverment, or military installation or persons
Texan Hotrodders
20-07-2006, 23:52
I believe a terrorist attack should be redefined as a attack by a non military or para military organization directed against civilian, goverment, or military installation or persons
A couple of points, mate.
1. Amendments are illegal.
2. It's too late to revise the resolution at this point.
You might take it up with the author if this one doesn't pass, but I wouldn't get your hopes up about him changing it. A lot of thought was put into that definition during the drafting process.
Omigodtheykilledkenny
21-07-2006, 01:25
Another point: Use the damned Official Topic thread. It's right there, at the top of the forum.
Texan Hotrodders
21-07-2006, 01:26
Another point: Use the damned Official Topic thread. It's right there, at the top of the forum.
And even if it hadn't been damned, it'd still be good to use. :cool:
Cluichstan
21-07-2006, 02:47
I believe a terrorist attack should be redefined as a attack by a non military or para military organization directed against civilian, goverment, or military installation or persons
OOC: Ahem... :p
The Most Glorious Hack
21-07-2006, 05:02
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v251/Tindalos/UN/lock.jpg