AT A VOTE: There is currently no UN Resolution at a vote
Dancing Bananland
23-03-2006, 00:14
Ok, so it said there was no resolution at a vote, and it said I could debate this lack of resolutions on the UN FORUM!, so I came on over here, and lo and behold, nobody is debating this issue. So I thought I'd take this opportunity to open up the floor.
The Godweavers
23-03-2006, 01:17
I am entirely for the lack of current resolutions. The number of pointless or redundant resolutions that have been passed already is astounding.
Omigodtheykilledkenny
23-03-2006, 01:56
Then resign.
Forgottenlands
23-03-2006, 02:42
Ok, so it said there was no resolution at a vote, and it said I could debate this lack of resolutions on the UN FORUM!, so I came on over here, and lo and behold, nobody is debating this issue. So I thought I'd take this opportunity to open up the floor.
There's about a 12hr turnaround between a finished vote and the next resolution.
But yeah....we're debating proposals.....doesn't trying to fix the problem by getting more proposals done count?
Ausserland
23-03-2006, 03:00
Ok, so it said there was no resolution at a vote, and it said I could debate this lack of resolutions on the UN FORUM!, so I came on over here, and lo and behold, nobody is debating this issue. So I thought I'd take this opportunity to open up the floor.
We thank the representative of Dancing Bananaland for opening debate on this important issue. We had intended to make a long speech on the subject, but we seem to have misplaced our notes. We'll take a nap instead. :D
Lorelei M. Ahlmann
Ambassador-at-Zzzzzzzzzz