NationStates Jolt Archive


Artistic Freedom

Syawla
01-01-2006, 18:45
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Jey

Description: The General Assembly of the United Nations,

NOTING Article II of Resolution #26, “The Universal Bill of Rights,” which states that “All human beings have the right to express themselves through speech and through the media without any interference.”

ACKNOWLEDGING that the majority of artistic genres are not transmitted by speech or the media; thus

CONSIDERING that the rights of artists are not covered by any N.S.U.N. resolution;

UNDERSTANDING that artistic freedom should be protected and promoted throughout the world;

1. DEFINES for the purpose of this resolution:

a) A “work of art” as an object (such as a painting or sculpture) or intellectual construct (such as a novel or musical piece) created with the primary purpose of attaining aesthetic value,

b) An “artist” as a person who plays a major creative role on either the construction of an original work of art, or the interpretation of an existing work of art;

2. DECLARES the rights of artists to create and interpret works of art, and of any person to distribute and preserve them, without interference from other individuals, any government, or the N.S.U.N., provided they:

a) RESPECT national and international law on property rights, including copyrights,

b) ENSURE that no other person is harmed, or likely to be harmed, directly or otherwise, by their activities,

c) RESPECT any other relevant legislation that does not directly restrict their freedom of expression;

3. ENCOURAGES N.S.U.N. members to endorse and promote all artistic genres, by such means as they see fit, as long as these genres do not infringe on the restrictions described in clause 2.

Co-Authored By: Fonzoland

Votes For: 955

Votes Against: 313

[Delegate Votes]

Voting Ends: Thu Jan 5 2006

While acknowledging the honourable nature of the said motion and the motives for its creation, I oppose this legislation due to the following reasons:

-It infringes upon areas of national sovereignty that are not traditionally the concern of the United Nations.

- It can be used by Non-Governmental Groups to prevent nations from using their prerogatives to greater good ends in the name of artistic freedom. Such instances include the classification of theatre, film and printed work.

- It ignores national cultural divides. In some countries for instance, it is artistically permitted for films involving the torture of animals. Such legislation will compromise all international efforts to curb such activities alongside other less desirable ones.
Kernwaffen
01-01-2006, 18:47
Just vote against it then, unless you're proposing a repeal to a resolution that still hasn't passed yet which in that case, I've got nothing to say.
Ceorana
01-01-2006, 18:48
I think you should use the official topic, stickied at the top of this forum, for comments, so we don't have a million topics like this floating around. ;)
Jey
01-01-2006, 19:20
While acknowledging the honourable nature of the said motion and the motives for its creation, I oppose this legislation due to the following reasons:

-It infringes upon areas of national sovereignty that are not traditionally the concern of the United Nations.

- It can be used by Non-Governmental Groups to prevent nations from using their prerogatives to greater good ends in the name of artistic freedom. Such instances include the classification of theatre, film and printed work.

- It ignores national cultural divides. In some countries for instance, it is artistically permitted for films involving the torture of animals. Such legislation will compromise all international efforts to curb such activities alongside other less desirable ones.

First, use the Official Topic.

Now, about your points.

-Any and every "Human Rights" resolution can be argued that it infringes on NatSov. So arguing this makes no sense, as there is a Human Rights category and a reason for it.

-Um, how? If the artists do not allow primarily physical and/or psycological harm, respect property rights, and other relevant laws that dont infringe on their freedom of expression, theres no way anyone can take away their artistic freedom

-All artistic genres are encouraged to be promoted/protected as long as they dont infringe on those 3 restrictions.