NationStates Jolt Archive

Bringing back what seemed to be a heated discussion, I have accepted the fact that changing the games mechanics is not going to happen. That doesn't mean however, that debating whether these changes would have positive or negative effects would be a bad thing. There is no harm in it. I therefore support Dariush the Greatest as he made a valuable point that in the time they allow for a vote to be passed vs the delegates not regularly checking the propositions, I think it is completely reasonable for propositions to CURRENTLY be passed with less endorsements.

Now before anyone decides to lose it on me, remember that I am fully aware that this is not going to happen, however, I am just putting it up for debate.

Sincerely,
The Democratic States of Haroutioun

Would it be nice if the mods gave us chocolate bars?

Yes.

Is it going to happen?

No.

Am I going to debate whether the mods should give us chocolate bars?

No.

Does anything you debate about really have the chance of making a difference anyway? Probably not. Debate is simply a expression of disagreement and why. I think debating this is a lot more worthwhile than mods giving us chocolate bars.

If you wish to discuss changes to how the game operates, there's a really handy forum called "Technical" where that sort of thing belongs. This forum is for debating UN Proposals and Resolutions. Since a Proposal to change mechanics is illegal, further discussion of altering how the UN is run is off topic for this forum.