Ban fishing , introduce fish farms.
UPDATED PROPOSAL:
Ban fishing, intro fishfarms
A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.
Category: Environmental
Industry Affected: All Businesses
Proposed by: Malmar
Description: Description: As trawlers and nets are declines the fish population.
Banning fishing will:
(1) repopulate the sea\rivers.
(2) Better fish due to controlled and appropiate diet and water control due pollution.
(3) More work will be produced as well as gain on economy
(as for those countries that have fisherman living on there jobs and maybe they even dont earn the day cos of low life or poverty fish farms will create jobs for then and family deu to the fact that a fishfarm needs more employers than a single fishing boat. with better wages and standerds) as at the same time improves the nation economy.
Texan Hotrodders
10-09-2005, 17:43
Would it do any good to Ban fishing , introduce fish farms.
As its proposed to the U.N. Together With the Animal Rights
Due the decrease of fish in rivers and sea we need to protect these species
by growing fish in fishfarms as a result we'll have a better product due to control fish diet as nessaccery and cotrolled water due pollution. AT LAST OF WHICH GOES STRAIGHT ON YOUR DINNER TABLE .
That sounds like a fine thing for you to implement in your nation. Just don't make it a UN resolution so my nation and others that don't need such a program are required to pay for such a scheme.
Minister of UN Affairs
Edward Jones
I hope you like the new proposal but it will be better for all as i do have a thriving economy dew to fish farms as in fact fish is not caught but produced.
Texan Hotrodders
10-09-2005, 18:07
I hope you like the new proposal but it will be better for all as i do have a thriving economy dew to fish farms as in fact fish is not caught but produced.
You do realize that this is entirely a waste of time for some nations because they have no bodies of water that can sustain life? For example, the land in my nation is almost all paved over with concrete and asphalt. This makes fish-bearing bodies of water rather difficult to find, to say the least.
Minister of UN Affairs
Edward Jones
Yes i do understand but i do know to that the same fishfarms can be built in the same sea\river with no truoble at all with the same efficience as on land .And it might be less expencive...
Texan Hotrodders
10-09-2005, 18:17
Yes i do understand but i do know to that the same fishfarms can be built in the same sea\river with no truoble at all with the same efficience as on land .And it might be less expencive...
No less expensive in terms of start-up and maintenance costs than importing fish from coastal neighbors.
Minister of UN Affairs
Edward Jones
I have to admit that at first will be difficult but real time here in malta its getting introduced by private org. and its really working good as u as a nation u get the monopol of it in you hand it will benefit to the nation straight away. + as i sad less unemployment and as an effect should benefit as well as a fish farm it can employ more than a boat. And the same fisherman can work in it.
But at any time you have to admit that a fish farm will produce more fish than a fisherman can catch in a whole life now , if its expensive at the first 1-2 years BUT at final of all things you will gain.
Liliths Vengeance
10-09-2005, 22:18
All of my standing bodies of water are either hydroponics or for consumption. How do you propose I implement this? Feed my people less or reduce their water intake?
Simonovastan
10-09-2005, 23:15
Banning humans from living near bodies of water would do wonders for the environment, as well. :rolleyes:
Fishing should not be banned, but an introductioned of government started fish farms and hatchery systems would be a good idea.
Peace
-psbass
while fish farms are a good idea, this billl is not for reasons already stated.