Axinon
27-07-2005, 18:25
NOTING that non-UN nations outnumber UN nations by about 3:1
NOTING ALSO that many non-UN nations have hostile relations with UN nations
NOTING ALSO that the policy of deterrence has been the most effective way of maintaining peace known to humankind.
NOTING ALSO that Chemical weapons were (prior to resolution 107) used by many small countries to deter an attack by a larger, more powerful country, as per the deterrence strategy.
NOTING ALSO that many small nations do not have the money to maintain a nuclear stockpile in order to deter attack in that way.
IT IS APPARENT that UN resolution 107 denies small, UN countries the ability to deter attack by a larger, aggressive state.
THEREFORE, the only logical course of action is to repeal UN resolution 107.
Im actually going to submit this sometime, but I wanted to see if anyone had any suggestions on how to improve this. And no, I will not support any type of repeal and replace on this resolution. But any advice on how to get this passed would be great.
NOTING ALSO that many non-UN nations have hostile relations with UN nations
NOTING ALSO that the policy of deterrence has been the most effective way of maintaining peace known to humankind.
NOTING ALSO that Chemical weapons were (prior to resolution 107) used by many small countries to deter an attack by a larger, more powerful country, as per the deterrence strategy.
NOTING ALSO that many small nations do not have the money to maintain a nuclear stockpile in order to deter attack in that way.
IT IS APPARENT that UN resolution 107 denies small, UN countries the ability to deter attack by a larger, aggressive state.
THEREFORE, the only logical course of action is to repeal UN resolution 107.
Im actually going to submit this sometime, but I wanted to see if anyone had any suggestions on how to improve this. And no, I will not support any type of repeal and replace on this resolution. But any advice on how to get this passed would be great.