NationStates Jolt Archive

Free Trade, strong. What you think about it?

The General Assembly of the United Nations,

RECOGNIZING the importance of expositions in the modern commercial world

PROPOSE the creation of the "Universal Exposition" (or EXPO), a world fair which aim is the promotion of the culture and strenght commercial trades between the nations.

Statute:

1) EXPO shall be over the control of the "Bureau of EXPO", formed by voluntary members from the UN state members. The decisions of the Bureau shall be made by simple majority. The Bureau shall have a Secretary, choiced on members and with a 10 years term.

2) The EXPO shall be each 5 years, in the nation that shall be choiced by the Bureau. The Theme of the EXPO shall be choiced only by the Bureau.

3) Each nation that will want organize the EXPO shall transmit its candidation to the Bureau, at least 3 years before the event.

4) 1 years before the EXPO, the Bureau will promote the partecipation to it from the UN Members, with a communication to the Economy Ministry of each state.

5) Each nation that will want to partecipate to the next EXPO shall give its decision to the Bureau, which will inform the country where the EXPO will be.

6) The cost of the EXPO will be on charge of the host state, which can mantain the moneys given by the tickets for the fair. The EXPO will cover also the costs for the Bureau.

I think this will be treated like an "Olympics" type of resolution, and would get bounced by a game moderator:

2) The EXPO shall be each 5 years, in the nation that shall be choiced by the Bureau. The Theme of the EXPO shall be choiced only by the Bureau.

Last Feburary, 1 Infinite Loop hosted a NationStates World's Fair. The idea certainly is a good one, and the UN could *maybe* endorse the idea, but we can't write anything that the moderators might think implies that there is a forum mandated activity. :/

pretty good



OOC:did you get your name from the marx brothers

Preamblatory Clause 2:
strengthen*? Instead of strenght?

Additionally, activating clause 1:
"choiced" should be "chosen by"

And, activating clause 2:
"choiced" should be "chosen"


I don't mean to sound like I'm harping on you, just trying to help out.

Actually...in a second post here, I'll just repost your resolution after I fix grammatical errors and such for you.

The General Assembly of the United Nations,

RECOGNIZING the importance of expositions in the modern commercial world.

PROPOSING the creation of the "Universal Exposition" (EXPO), a world fair which aims to promote the culture and strengthen commercial trades between the nations.

Statute:

1) EXPO shall be under the control of the "Bureau of EXPO," formed by voluntary UN member states. The decisions of the Bureau shall be made by simple majority. The Bureau shall have a Secretary, chosen by EXPO members and with a 10 years term.

2) The EXPO shall be each 5 years, in a nation that shall be chosen by the Bureau. The Theme of the EXPO shall be chosen only by the Bureau.

3) Each nation wishing to host the EXPO shall make its candidacy known to the Bureau at least 3 years before the event.

4) One year before the EXPO, the Bureau will promote the participation of it to UN members, with a communication to the Economy Ministry of each state.

5) Each nation that wishes to participate in the next EXPO shall inform the Bureau, which will inform the country where the EXPO will be.

6) The cost of the EXPO will be on charge of the host state, which can mantain the moneys given by the tickets for the fair. The EXPO will also cover the costs for the Bureau.

There, fixed the grammar...

It's a good idea. We support it.

I think this will be treated like an "Olympics" type of resolution, and would get bounced by a game moderator:


Yeah. There's that fine line between the "UN Peace Prize" proposal--which I believe would still be legal under Hackian rules, and metagame violations/"Olympics" proposals. Republic of Freedonia, I'm not sure where I think this one would fall on the line, but I'm certain that care should be taken (and open-mindedness to change) to make certain it's a legal move.

According to my recollection of the Olympics debacle, that was only ruled illegal because it required forum activity. As long as it doesn',t it should be fine.

Though you might want to change to time period - perhaps to something like 'at a regular interval' rather than every five years.

Preamblatory Clause 2:
strengthen*? Instead of strenght?

Additionally, activating clause 1:
"choiced" should be "chosen by"

And, activating clause 2:
"choiced" should be "chosen"


I don't mean to sound like I'm harping on you, just trying to help out.

Actually...in a second post here, I'll just repost your resolution after I fix grammatical errors and such for you.

Because I'm not english, your grammar spelling is welcome.

About game violation, if it is with voluntary membership it is not ok?

I like this idea. If only there were a way for UN resolutions to affect cultural ratings.