NationStates Jolt Archive

>Realising that the UN has a responsbility to look after the concrns and well-being of the less-well-off citizens
>Understanding that in many areas the economy gets priority over the populace
>Believing that a happy populace is more profitable
>Recognising that the wealthy should not be seen as 'aloof' by the genertal population, and that due to having lower incomes are not able to lead the same quality of life
>Therefore concluding that the UN has an inherent responsability to improve the lives of citizens in its member states and set an example to the rest of the world

Greetings.

We realise, understand, believe, recognize and conclude: what then should we of Roathin do?

Yeah, great idea. Social equality, and happy citizens, and ...hey, wait a second.

You didn't actually propose to do anything specific, just to 'improve the lives of citizens'...
That might be a bit too open to interpretation. What is the UN supposed to do, buy citizens of member countries televisions and beer? It is hard to tell unless more specifics are given.

~Samantha Ballard, UN Representative for Neo-Anarchists

REALISING that the UN has a responsbility to look after the concrns and well-being of the less-well-off citizens

UNDERSTANDING that in many areas the economy gets priority over the populace

BELIEVING that a happy populace is more profitable

RECOGNISING that the wealthy should not be seen as 'aloof' by the genertal population, and that due to having lower incomes are not able to lead the same quality of life

CONCLUDING that the UN has an inherent responsability to improve the lives of citizens in its member states and set an example to the rest of the world, the UN,

ESTABLISHES a committee.

There, now isn't that much better? :D

Yes Yelda, I agree, ur version is far beta, and the commitee - will it be composed of all nations in the UN, or just some - are the aims of the law clear enough ??? I'm not 100% sure, comments plz ?

>>>Recognising that the wealthy should not be seen as 'aloof' by the genertal population, and that due to having lower incomes are not able to lead the same quality of life<<<

The upper statement just doesn't make much sense... It turns out that the wealthy have lower incomes... O.o


Frankly, I'm not really sure who we can improve social inequality except make everyone middle class :p Social inequality has existed since the dawn od civilization...

REALISING that the UN has a responsbility to look after the concrns and well-being of the less-well-off citizens

UNDERSTANDING that in many areas the economy gets priority over the populace

BELIEVING that a happy populace is more profitable

RECOGNISING that the wealthy should not be seen as 'aloof' by the genertal population, and that due to having lower incomes are not able to lead the same quality of life

CONCLUDING that the UN has an inherent responsability to improve the lives of citizens in its member states and set an example to the rest of the world, the UN,

ESTABLISHES a committee.

There, now isn't that much better? :D
Argh!
http://bak42.notworksafe.com/images/NationStates/UNCards/AnotherUselessCommittee.JPG

Bob Flibble
UN Representative

Social inequality has existed since the dawn od civilization...

But, To be Frank, Where would we be without it?


Answer: All Farmers

Without Rich people, there cannot be employers of less rich people, i will point out this early in my post that i am not rich, but i recognise the significance of rich people. Point being:

1) The Government

Without The Government (aka rich people) we would most probably descend to chaos, not have Schools or anything other than Farmers, because there is noone to teach anyone anything and there is no reason to learn.which leads me onto

2) Industry

Industry would be non existant, because there would be no money, and no technology, because it would not be worthwhile to invent it, because there is no money in the buisness and noone to buy it and the end of it

Conclusion
There will always be social inequality, unless we go back a couple of centurys, but then still someone will find a way to make them inequal.

Rich people are rich people because they recognised the significance of their actions when they were young and payed attention in school, the Inequality is by no means Inheritant, unless your father is pretty rich


The Free Land of Aeuqitas

Indeed. For example: you and your friend live in two identical houses. Everything inside is the same. But one day your friend gets a better job and buys a plazma screen TV. And then you say its social inequality...

...

...Right?...

:(

Argh!
http://bak42.notworksafe.com/images/NationStates/UNCards/AnotherUselessCommittee.JPG

Bob Flibble
UN Representative
Heh, I couldn't restrain myself. I've been waiting for someone to write a resolution that did nothing more than "establish a committee".

Heh, I couldn't restrain myself. I've been waiting for someone to write a resolution that did nothing more than "establish a committee".
Just like I couldn't restrain myself from playing the card.:D

Bob Flibble
UN Representative

hehehe, ok ok, so it seems this is doomed-ed to fail, but it was fun whilst it lasted ;p