NationStates Jolt Archive


Following a precedent...

Bagdadi Georgia
03-07-2005, 21:19
...set by the repeal of the biological weapons resolution, Bagdadi Georgia urges you to support the following resolution:

http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/06238/page=UN_proposal/start=80 (currently)

-

Repeal "Ban Chemical Weapons"
A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution

Category: Repeal
Resolution: #107
Proposed by: Bagdadi Georgia

Description: UN Resolution #107: Ban Chemical Weapons (Category: Global Disarmament; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The United Nations believes that a world free of chemical weapons would be a safer and better world. However, we also believe that resolution 107 is flawed, and as such may not be effective in achieving this outcome, and may even be counter-productive. As such, we believe that it should be repealed and replaced with a more effective resolution, with the recent repeal of resolution 16 - an ineffective anti-biological weapons resolution - as a precedent.

Among the faults of resolution 107 are the following:

It does not define the term 'chemical weapons', leaving possible loopholes where states may declare chemical weapons as 'chemical agents', or other terms, to circumvent the resolution;

The term 'trafficking' is not further defined, so that nations may claim that they are able to purchase chemical weapons as long as they do not attempt to resell them without being accused of 'trafficking';

Worst of all - the resolution calls for the 'ultimate decommissioning' of chemical weapons, but lacking further detail, it does not actually prevent nations 'decommissioning' chemical weapons by using them against other nations!

For these reasons the resolution must be repealed so that a watertight replacement can be drafted, and so that confidence in the legislation of the UN and of its ability to enforce this legislation can be restored.

Approvals: 12 (DSM-IV, Yelda, Myotismon, Arlona, Darth Mall, The Inner Universe, Finbergia, Ness Snorlaxia, Flibbleites, NewTexas, Nevscrow, Amazar)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 133 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Wed Jul 6 2005
Swishland
03-07-2005, 22:25
I'm not going to fall for that one again.
Snoogit
03-07-2005, 23:50
The precident seems to be turning back bans, and allowing mega-weapons to be constructed.

Good luck getting it passed.