NationStates Jolt Archive

this resolution seems to be aiming at increasing the offensive nature of the UN agaisnt non members.

The UCFN strongly opposes this resolution as it only adds to the hostility of the UN

As non-UN members are increasingly hostile, UN-members keep finding their hands tied by UN resolutions. UN nations are at a disadvantage, and I do not see much advantage to being in an organization that tells me I cannot wage war effectivly - if I'm forced into a defensive war.

that is why i oppose the UN in the first place. it controls to much and dominates over weak regions and nations. they put people into the position where its hard to make a difference if your not in the UN.

The Republic of Lanquassia is anything but dominated by the United Nations. We agree with most of the policies implimented by the United Nations as they make sense to us.

What worries us is that in the humanitarian (I misspelled that, forgive me :( ) attempt to reduce the horrors of the world and increase the blessings of the world, there are certain limitations placed upon us by the United Nations that, in times of just and even unjust war, members of the UN are at a disadvantage compared to non-members.

It is for this reason that I believe the UN should limit itself to a suggestive role, as opposed to a mandating role, when it comes to nuclear armaments.

Biological and Chemical weapons is against both the Constitution of the Republic of Lanquassia and the Charters of her Colonies, but also against the morals of the Lanquassian people and immigrants.

Please to be using the official discussion thread.