NationStates Jolt Archive


The Rights of the Intersexed Act

Naspar Cosif
05-05-2005, 05:15
Here's a potential UN Resolution that I'd appreciate constructive critisms for:


The General Assembly,

NOTING that not all humans in the world are either fully female or fully male. As many as 1 percent of live births exhibit some degree of sexual ambiguity.

RECGONIZING that there are two main ways thru which the sex of an individual is determined in most societies:
1)By the appearance of the individual's genitalia
2)By the sex chromosome pair of the individual (XX=Female, XY=Male)

DECLARING that this system of sex determination is prone to errors, as:

1)Individuals can be born with ambiguous genitalia, in which the individual possessess features of both female and male genitals
2)Not all persons are born with a XX or XY chromosome set. There are cases of XO, XXX, XXY, XYY, XO/XY, XY persons with female genitals and XX persons with male genitals.

REALIZING that such persons could be considered neither female nor male, and therefore denied the rights granted in the sex equality resolutions.

ALSO REALIZING that in many nations, one's legal sex may still taken into account, despite equal rights. Examples of this include; sex-segregated lavatories/changing rooms, government census/surveys, and various youth organizations.

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT

1)Individuals with ambiguous sex charateristics are granted the full rights of those persons legally considered females and males.

2)Intersexed persons have the right to become legally female or male, to facilitate their integration into a largely two-sexed society.These individuals also retain the right to be considered 'intersexed' at their disgression.



What do you think?
The Lynx Alliance
05-05-2005, 05:29
the rights thing i think is covered under various rights resolutions, including rights of minorities and women (under the catagory of minorities), but you will have to check with mods.
the other part.... i am unsure about that, as i could be deemed insignificant if the rights point is already covered
Naspar Cosif
05-05-2005, 05:44
the rights thing i think is covered under various rights resolutions, including rights of minorities and women (under the catagory of minorities), but you will have to check with mods.
the other part.... i am unsure about that, as i could be deemed insignificant if the rights point is already covered

The main issue is that all of the resolutions seem to assume that all citizens are either male or female. This resolution would prevent nations from using the 'You arn't either one!' loophole to restrict intersexual rights.

For example: In the Abortion Rights one, it says that the government cannot stop 'All WOMEN' from having an abortion. Say there is an XXY female who is chromosonally male. The government could say they can't have an abortion, because, by that nation's defintition, that person is a man.
Druidville
05-05-2005, 05:45
Is this really a problem?
Naspar Cosif
05-05-2005, 05:48
Is this really a problem?

It could be. I don't rule an oppressive nation, so I wouldn't know... ;)

...These centres must be sensitive and cater to the needs of intersex people

This is all that is really said about intersexed people in all of the passed resolutions. The SRL also speaks of all sexes, but, as I have said before, a wily government could call an intersexed person 'neither' or 'in-between' and therefore the UN rules don't apply to those persons...
Naspar Cosif
05-05-2005, 06:06
Perhaps I should add a clause that says that legally they may constitute a 'Thid sex' thereby granting them protection?
The Lynx Alliance
05-05-2005, 07:10
It could be. I don't rule an oppressive nation, so I wouldn't know... ;)
and if you were, you would be subjected to a number of passed resolutions that you couldnt get away with it already. as i said, run it by a mod, but i believe this is covered
Krioval
05-05-2005, 07:16
OOC: Biologically, a male with XXY (Kleinfelter's syndrome) is sterile. The same is true for XO females (Turner's syndrome), XX males, and XY females as far as I can recall. So abortion isn't really an issue in these cases.
Vastiva
05-05-2005, 07:20
OOC: Biologically, a male with XXY (Kleinfelter's syndrome) is sterile. The same is true for XO females (Turner's syndrome), XX males, and XY females as far as I can recall. So abortion isn't really an issue in these cases.

OOC: Read my lips. "With TECHNOLOGY, anything is possible". :D
The Lynx Alliance
05-05-2005, 07:25
i thought XXX and XXY was supposed to be downs syndrome
Naspar Cosif
05-05-2005, 07:38
How do I 'run it by a mod'?
Krioval
05-05-2005, 07:41
i thought XXX and XXY was supposed to be downs syndrome

Down Syndrome is a trisomy (three copies) of Chromosome 21
The Lynx Alliance
05-05-2005, 07:41
ask a moderator to look over the proposal. thats what the term means
Naspar Cosif
05-05-2005, 07:44
I know that.

The thing is, I don't know HOW to contact a mod, other than through the tech reports, which offers no way for response.
The Lynx Alliance
05-05-2005, 07:57
fris will wander through here at one point. also, you can pm or tg them to look it over
Yuunli
05-05-2005, 09:00
I'd support the proposal in principle.
Hirota
05-05-2005, 09:06
I like this proposal. It's well written, provides a decent preamble, and provides fair legislation.

Are you a puppet nation perchance?
Naspar Cosif
05-05-2005, 09:30
Are you a puppet nation perchance?

Indeed, I am.
Hirota
05-05-2005, 11:12
Indeed, I am.

I didn't think a newbie nation would be that adept at writing resolutions ;)
Naspar Cosif
05-05-2005, 22:11
I didn't think a newbie nation would be that adept at writing resolutions ;)

Its not hard at all. A 7-year old could come up with proposals of this quality (provided that (s)he had the information). The real problem is that most people are lazy, and don't want to put some effort into their work (example: my 'Save the Trees' proposal... LOL!)
The Most Glorious Hack
06-05-2005, 02:37
Hm.

Discrimination Accord (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=8689431&postcount=100): RESOLVES upon protecting all persons and groups in member nations from discrimination by their respective member governments;

REQUIRES member governments to fairly and equally apply the following rights of citizens as they are upheld by international and national law:

4. Any social dividends paid out to or provided for persons or groups deemed by member national or international government to be in social need (unemployment benefits, health care, etc.), including, but not limited to, those social dividends secured by international law,

§ The UN condemns discrimination by governments, discrimination on the basis of differences in recognized religion, race, sex, sexual orientation, age, language, school of thought, or intelligence.

§ The UN disallows member governments from discriminating the previously described rights (protection under law, participation in government, etc.) based upon such differences.

Rights of Minorities and Women (http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=7565919&postcount=81):The UN should recognize that all people are created equal. The matter of race, sex, religion or sexual preference should not make anyone less equal. These are inalienable rights of all UN nation citizens.

The Sexes Rights Law (http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=7030222&postcount=70):5. The Nation States United Nations recognises that gender is not just a physical manifestation but also a mental manifestation, and recognises that people of self proclaimed gender are also equally protected by the regulations and recommendations bound here in.

While not specifically addressing your points, the above Resolutions seem to largely cover your concerns.
Naspar Cosif
06-05-2005, 02:40
While not specifically addressing your points, the above Resolutions seem to largely cover your concerns.

So, is it a dead proposal then? :sniper:
The Lynx Alliance
06-05-2005, 02:45
So, is it a dead proposal then? :sniper:
i would say so, and it is what i pointed out from the beginning.