NationStates Jolt Archive


No to Organ Donor Centralization

Sissy Boys
04-03-2005, 12:21
Delegates think! Do we really want a centralized, global agency in the hands of UN bureuacracts deciding what happens to our loved ones' organs? And how might this universal UN global card be abused? Next thing you know, it will have a DNA chip, and will morph into a global identity card, with dire implications for national sovereignty and individual rights. I could support a scaled down version that facilitates government-to-government, or NGO-to-NGO efforts to establish a network for sharing of available organs for transplant, but the wording of this -- putting it all in the hands of the UN, goes way too far.
Fass
04-03-2005, 12:23
1. "Slippery slope" is a fallacy.

2. There already is an official thread. Use it!
Resistancia
04-03-2005, 12:26
okay, first off, overreaction much! a) membership, from what i can tell, is volentary. b) the UN would work in conjunction with nations and the red cross/cresent in order to distibute the organs. the other claims are just sensationalisation.

and i forgot: there is an official thread already
RichardPottertopia
04-03-2005, 16:39
i don't want you vampires trying to steal my blood and organs



back off


or you will be crushed
Frisbeeteria
04-03-2005, 16:43
http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=401144