NationStates Jolt Archive


I wasnt sure if the UN members were aware of the word "REPEAL"

M4oZ3dong
19-02-2005, 03:54
I wasnt sure if the UN members were aware of the word "REPEAL." When i had first approached this issue, i quickly voted FOR for the global library. But just now on a Friday, i reread the proposal, and it had said "Repeal Global LIbrary." Therefore i quickly changed my vote to AGAINST. If you have known that the proposal was a repealing movement, then I would like to kno why you chose to go FOR the repeal, because i clearly see nothing wrong with global intelligience.
Jeianga
19-02-2005, 04:09
We are very aware of the word repeal, and I would thank you not to insult our intelligence again.

The Global Library was a terrible resolution, if you had read it and the forum where we have debated its uselessness you would understand why a repeal is appropriate.
Krioval
19-02-2005, 04:14
I wasnt sure if the UN members were aware of the word "REPEAL." When i had first approached this issue, i quickly voted FOR for the global library. But just now on a Friday, i reread the proposal, and it had said "Repeal Global LIbrary." Therefore i quickly changed my vote to AGAINST. If you have known that the proposal was a repealing movement, then I would like to kno why you chose to go FOR the repeal, because i clearly see nothing wrong with global intelligience.

Please take some time to read the thread devoted to the repeal effort to see why people are voting the way they are. We are working on a replacement that we feel will be a stronger resolution.
Asshelmetta
19-02-2005, 05:07
I wasnt sure if the UN members were aware of the word "REPEAL." When i had first approached this issue, i quickly voted FOR for the global library. But just now on a Friday, i reread the proposal, and it had said "Repeal Global LIbrary." Therefore i quickly changed my vote to AGAINST. If you have known that the proposal was a repealing movement, then I would like to kno why you chose to go FOR the repeal, because i clearly see nothing wrong with global intelligience.
Funniest post I've seen so far today.
Pojonia
19-02-2005, 06:11
I wasnt sure if the UN members were aware of the word "REPEAL." When i had first approached this issue, i quickly voted FOR for the global library. But just now on a Friday, i reread the proposal, and it had said "Repeal Global LIbrary." Therefore i quickly changed my vote to AGAINST. If you have known that the proposal was a repealing movement, then I would like to kno why you chose to go FOR the repeal, because i clearly see nothing wrong with global intelligience.

This is wrong in so many ways.

First you completely ignored the repeals wording.

Then, you looked at it for another half second, realized it was a repeal and not a proposal, and changed your vote. Ignoring the repeals wording.

Then, you ask everyone who hasn't been ignoring the repeals wording why they haven't been ignoring the repeals wording, and reference "global intelligience", which has very little to do with the resolution and which you spelled wrong.

I'd post direct refutation, but what's the point?
Venerable libertarians
19-02-2005, 06:17
I am wondering if this guy is a delegate??
If it appears he/she is then again the Issue of my "Member Protest" again rears its ugly head!

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=397510&page=1&pp=40

:headbang:
Nargopia
19-02-2005, 07:05
I hate it when people base their entire opinion and vote on the title of a proposal without bothering to read the actual text. At least I'm hoping this MZO3dork didn't read the text, otherwise what does that say about simple reading comprehension...
Krioval
19-02-2005, 07:09
I have to admit, it's pretty hard to miss the word "repeal" since it's in the header right next to "The Global Library". :rolleyes:
Texan Hotrodders
19-02-2005, 07:13
Funniest post I've seen so far today.

Agreed.
Nargopia
19-02-2005, 07:42
I have to admit, it's pretty hard to miss the word "repeal" since it's in the header right next to "The Global Library". :rolleyes:
Oh, you mean those huge bold words at the top? What did they say again? Oh yeah: REPEAL "THE GLOBAL LIBRARY."
Kelssek
20-02-2005, 12:01
i clearly see nothing wrong with global intelligience.

Well, judging by your post, there's a lot wrong with global intelligence, not to mention global literacy.
The left foot
21-02-2005, 00:05
This cleary means action has to be taken to protect us from people like this. I think a quiz on a proposal before you may vote on it. You would have to get at least a C or better and no retakes. :headbang: = why M4oZ3dong = :confused: