Dresophila Prime
30-01-2005, 19:01
Repeal "Refugee Protection Act"
A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #65 (Refugee Protection Act)
Proposed by: Dresophila Prime
Description: United Nations Resolution #65: Refugee Protection Act (Category: Social Justice, Strength: mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
Argument:
-Seeing as the refugees requesting passage may well be criminals and escaped convicts, thieves or saboteurs,
-Realizing that all UN nations have the right to decide who they wish to admit to their nations,
-Taking into account that the resolution "Refugee Protection Act" may very well warrant tens of thousands of refugees into a nation that does not have the capacity to sustain them,
-Considering that the citizens of a UN nation may potentially react violently with the refugees due to a tenuous past of war and/or dispute,
-Noting that the same goal of refugee harboring may be achieved by more altruistic, wealthy nations,
UN Resolution #65 (Refugee Protection Act) is decided as an unjust legisation, violating the rights of UN citizens. Moreover, the generosity of UN nations shall not be decided by the UN, but by the nation itself.
~~~~~~~~~~~
This is already submitted, so if you like, please endorse it, if not (if you wish to flame) then keep it to yourself please. The actual resolution is right...
...here: http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=7030195&postcount=66
A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #65 (Refugee Protection Act)
Proposed by: Dresophila Prime
Description: United Nations Resolution #65: Refugee Protection Act (Category: Social Justice, Strength: mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
Argument:
-Seeing as the refugees requesting passage may well be criminals and escaped convicts, thieves or saboteurs,
-Realizing that all UN nations have the right to decide who they wish to admit to their nations,
-Taking into account that the resolution "Refugee Protection Act" may very well warrant tens of thousands of refugees into a nation that does not have the capacity to sustain them,
-Considering that the citizens of a UN nation may potentially react violently with the refugees due to a tenuous past of war and/or dispute,
-Noting that the same goal of refugee harboring may be achieved by more altruistic, wealthy nations,
UN Resolution #65 (Refugee Protection Act) is decided as an unjust legisation, violating the rights of UN citizens. Moreover, the generosity of UN nations shall not be decided by the UN, but by the nation itself.
~~~~~~~~~~~
This is already submitted, so if you like, please endorse it, if not (if you wish to flame) then keep it to yourself please. The actual resolution is right...
...here: http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=7030195&postcount=66