NationStates Jolt Archive


Whats the pint of the U.N.

Amber Pacifica
21-12-2004, 17:32
In the U.N., there are various bills passed, which are needless to say liberal views, if Republican, or nuetrals wish to change these decisions, then we must join to actually make an arguement
The Not-so-superheros
21-12-2004, 17:43
I agree with you, weall needto group together to get some of our resolutions passed.
Tekania
21-12-2004, 17:44
In the U.N., there are various bills passed, which are needless to say liberal views, if Republican, or nuetrals wish to change these decisions, then we must join to actually make an arguement

I don't base things on radical liberalism vs. moralist coservatism. I base things on reason. In a Libertine perspective.

There are only 2 resolution I do not like, at present, in the NSUN.
1 on applicable grounds, and 1 on technical grounds.

They are the Law of the Sea, and The Abortion Rights Resolution; in that order.

I am a Republic, it is the duty of a Republic to look out for the rights, and liberties, of each and every individual. As such, that makes me "Republican" in that area. And little of the NSUN resolutions are in opposition of a Republican view of government, so your argument is false.
The Black New World
21-12-2004, 17:53
When did Republican become to opposite of liberal? Surely conservative is the opposite of liberal.

Slightly ironic lessons on the global nature of the internet by
Giordano,
UN representative,
The Black New World
Frisbeeteria
21-12-2004, 17:59
http://www.brewingmuseum.org/images/holiday_items/Pint.jpg

Notice the laurel leaves. This is the official Pint of the UN.
The Black New World
21-12-2004, 18:05
You and your cultural imperialism, that isn't dark enough to be an official anything.

Giordano,
UN representative,
The Black New World
Tekania
21-12-2004, 18:15
Now its really official!

http://www.geocities.com/tekcomputers/pint.jpg
DemonLordEnigma
21-12-2004, 18:53
In the U.N., there are various bills passed, which are needless to say liberal views, if Republican, or nuetrals wish to change these decisions, then we must join to actually make an arguement

You do realize the majority of the UN supports those views, right? Otherwise, they would have been removed by now.

Also, the problem you have with making an arguement is you need a mountainload of evidence to back it and have to deal with the fact most of the time they don't bother to read past the title, making most repeal attempts impossible.
Frisbeeteria
21-12-2004, 19:00
You and your cultural imperialism, that isn't dark enough to be an official anything.
Yet another literalist who doesn't understand the value of context and advertising. It's not the contents that are official, it's the measure. Since the UN is metric, it's necessary to define other units of measurement explicitly rather than implicitly. The amber fluid is merely to highlight the graphics on the vessel.


I swear, sometimes it's impossible for me to clearly to make my pint at all.