UN Authority Act.
Espanolandia
20-11-2004, 15:45
undefined undefined
Would anyone please tell me how to get endorsements on my proposal? Here is my proposal if anyone is interested! ;)
UN AUTHORITY ACT
Description: The United Nations shall be the ultimate governing body in the World. Being above the member states in the political heirarchy, creating a more peaceuful and stable world.
Amendment 1: All member states will abide to the will of the UN.
Amendment 2: All member states must adhere to the issues of the UN
Amendment 3: All member states shall recognize the authority of the UN as being a higher authority of their government.
Amendment 4: All member states shall be equal in the eyes of the UN and shall not be discriminatory.
Cordially, Espanolandia
The Most Glorious Hack
20-11-2004, 15:48
Posting in the UN Forum would probably be a good start.
Moved.
Hersfold
20-11-2004, 16:45
UN AUTHORITY ACT
Description: The United Nations shall be the ultimate governing body in the World. Being above the member states in the political heirarchy, creating a more peaceuful and stable world.
Amendment 1: All member states will abide to the will of the UN.
Amendment 2: All member states must adhere to the issues of the UN
Amendment 3: All member states shall recognize the authority of the UN as being a higher authority of their government.
Amendment 4: All member states shall be equal in the eyes of the UN and shall not be discriminatory.
Cordially, Espanolandia
All of these "Amendments", which they are not, by the way, are already in effect. All member states must abide to the will of the UN in the form of it's resolutions. The Compliance Ministry automatically makes members adhere to the laws or issues of the UN. The UN must be a higher authority, otherwise it would not be able to infringe on national soverignty like it does. And if members are not already equal in the eyes of the UN, then this is in violation of a resolution that condems dictatorships or something.
Also, as I mentioned, these are not amendments as you call them. Amendments are illegal, and there are some mods who see the word "Amendment", and freak, as I know from experience. This is not a worthy proposal. Keep working.
The Black New World
20-11-2004, 17:45
This does…. what exactly?
You do not have our support.
Lady Desdemona of Merwell,
Senior UN representative,
The Black New World,
Delegate to The Order of The Valiant States
DemonLordEnigma
20-11-2004, 17:47
This changes game mechanics. That is illegal. Enough said.
This changes game mechanics. That is illegal. Enough said.
Actually it doesn't :} Nothing that is written in the proposal does anything other than what is already happening.
Except maybe the higher authority thing. But that is a matter of perspective I guess.
DemonLordEnigma
20-11-2004, 18:37
Actually it doesn't :} Nothing that is written in the proposal does anything other than what is already happening.
Except maybe the higher authority thing. But that is a matter of perspective I guess.
It is that statement of "ultimate governing body in the World" that I was working on. Otherwise, it is still a game-mechanics (even if the rest changes nothing) resolution and, as such, illegal.
The Black New World
20-11-2004, 18:37
Actually it doesn't :} Nothing that is written in the proposal does anything other than what is already happening.
Except maybe the higher authority thing. But that is a matter of perspective I guess.
If I remember correctly proposals that affirm Game Mechanics (and do nothing else) are equally illegal.
But don't take my word for it.
Lady Desdemona of Merwell,
Senior UN representative,
The Black New World
If I remember correctly proposals that affirm Game Mechanics (and do nothing else) are equally illegal.
But don't take my word for it.
Lady Desdemona of Merwell,
Senior UN representative,
The Black New World
Oh yeah - that is true. I am just saying that the proposal appears to be re-enforcing the way the game currently works :}
Anyway - I have no urge to support this.
Hersfold
20-11-2004, 21:30
While I admit is it about time we actually had someone recognize the fact that the UN can screw around with your nation as much as it wants, this is completely unneccessary.
And here I though the last resolution was redundant to the extreme.... And then someone goes and pulls something like this out..... REDUNDANT We do not need this law, as this is how things work... given how much people actually read present en-force resolutions, this is meaningless...
Tuesday Heights
20-11-2004, 22:23
The UN if of itself existing already enacts this "proposal."
Skredtch
20-11-2004, 22:43
Actually, all UN member nations aren't *totally* equal, because regional delegates get more votes, and only nations with enough endorsements can propose a resolution.
Actually, all UN member nations aren't *totally* equal, because regional delegates get more votes, and only nations with enough endorsements can propose a resolution.
Good point, which would make Article 4 a violation of Game mechanics...
get rid of 3, then i will support it.
Hersfold
21-11-2004, 01:50
get rid of 3, then i will support it.
There is no need to support this. Have you read the thread? The UN's existence already enforces this. If I ever see it in queue, I will report it to the mods, on the basis of it being unworthy of UN consideration.