NationStates Jolt Archive

-dont get me wrong. i support this issue entirely.
-however, there is a difference between saying "this is a good idea, lets sign it!" and actually enforcing the law.
-the fact of the matter is, somepeople tend to hold general "biased" towards certain things, and in many cases they tend to regard the very topics in that UN issue.
-if your going to support that issue, isnt that just like supporting the removal of military forces?

The Official "Rights of Minorities and Women" Thread. Use This One, Not A New One (http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=373945)


Is this not clear enough? It was right there on the page, third from the top when you posted this. One resolution. One topic. The rules. OK?

The Official "Rights of Minorities and Women" Thread. Use This One, Not A New One (http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=373945)


Is this not clear enough? It was right there on the page, third from the top when you posted this. One resolution. One topic. The rules. OK?




sheesh, you dont have to be such a jerk. actually i hadnt noticed it at first, just so you know. "the rules".... where in the rules does it say i cant create a thread based off my own opinion?

this is messe dup resolution. im all for womens rights. but no gay "love" and no minority rights. i mean cmon. look at the mexicans- i live in a areea with alot of them. they are dirty, illegal. drug trafficking mongloids. i cant belive this res. is winning -- screw up our countries

sheesh, you dont have to be such a jerk. actually i hadnt noticed it at first, just so you know. "the rules".... where in the rules does it say i cant create a thread based off my own opinion?

Personally, I would think the 13 other closed topics with similar names would have been a big hint. But that's just me.

And he was being nice. If he had been mean, he would have pointed out how common sense says that the mods closing all but one topic on the issue means that it is against forum rules to have more than one topic on the issue.