NationStates Jolt Archive


Ban on Nuclear Weapons, Amendments and endorsements

LauraGrad
05-11-2004, 23:12
The proposed UN resolution on the Ban Of Nuclear Weapons is good in theory but needs a lot of work.
This resolution has several flaws in that it is not detailed enough. In relation to clause1-which UN body will ensure the disarmament of nuclear weapons? If UN inspectors are denied access to a couintry suspected of having nuclear weapons-this resolution does not give any information on how the inspectors will be allowed gain access

*Clause 4- An appropriate commission will establish the modalities of dismantling of the nuclear armaments; all the states members will have the duty to respect them.
^how will members be appointed to this commission?
Who will be appointed?
What if a member of the commission is from a nuclear producing country?

I also wish to make an amendment to this resolution..I need another endorsement.. can someone help me?
DemonLordEnigma
05-11-2004, 23:44
My idea is to amend the resolution towards the exact opposite. Banning nuclear weapons only invites non-UN nations to take advantage of you and nuke you into oblivion. And I am admittedly not above doing it myself, except I purposefully dodge nukes.
Dirtyfrank
06-11-2004, 00:08
i refuse to ban nukes and will vote no on this resolution
Peaonusahl
06-11-2004, 00:37
In the future, I refuse to support any resolution that isn't written at least at the 8th grade level.
Unfree People
06-11-2004, 00:56
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=371293