NationStates Jolt Archive

Has any other nation become aware of the outrageous proposal that someone seriously wants up for vote. The banning of heterosexual marriages?! Nations that approve of civil rights and personal freedoms can accept the idea of same sex marriages. Although questionable, they harm no one except ideals of societies. I am not condemning it, just stating my opinion. But for anyone to ban the right of people to marry, to have kids in a natural way, is disgusting. Hetero marriage is different and more important than Homo marriage because most Hetero couples can have kids. To ban such a thing, especially to reduce populations, is sick and cruel. To release Homo pornagraphy and teach gay sex-ed is going WAY too far. A couple of the reasons why they teach sex-ed is to teach about the opposite sex and how to make sure you don't accidently have a baby. Teaching how gay
people have sex is pointless. There are no accidental births.

I believe that if this proposal ever comes to vote, and if it passed, our
societies would collapse under such stupidity. It ideas like banning Heterosexual marriages that turn people against gays and gay marriages. People become afraid that their rights will be taken away next.

If anyone has a different opinion, please share it.

Heavens! What an outrage! We must fight the evil genius of Pineapple Joe-bot, who has repeatedly shown his great skill in getting proposals passed and winning over the unwilling in highly-charged debate!
Ban Heterosexuality
A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.

Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: The Wanking Genius of Pineapple Joe-bot

Description: Population is exploding all over the planet at an uncontrolable rate. Methods of contraception and sterilization have been proposed, but as long as heterosexuality runs rampant, a nation's citizens will continue to keep popping out babies. Only by restricting procreation to controlled invitro fertilization can a nation hope to stop "The People Bomb." Therefore I propose that the UN member nations comply with the following suggestions:

-Legalize gay marriage, and slowly phase out any heterosexual unions

-Make it a crime to engage in a heterosexual act

-Set aside a large portion of taxes to funding homosexual propaganda, pornography, and gay-themed arts and entertainment

-Convert school sex-education classes to a wholly homosexual curriculum

-Cut funding and add taxes to religions and organizations that do not favor homosexuality

-Drop any sales tax from sexual toys

Another benefit to this shift in sexuality is the obsolescence of emotionally scarring disputes that are a symptom of the differences between the genders.

Evil Minions: 17 (Pineapple Joe-bot, Saniuqa, Dag Yo, Bacrum-Valeria, The Playboy Mistress, Simstonia, Girl on Girl on Male, Sovereign UN Territory, People of Iran, Holberg, Suburban Freedom, Islamist Terrists, The Pointing Monkey, Saccharin, LLJK, Tubesock, Unlimited)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 119 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Sat Sep 18 2004

Normally I'm all in favor of posting the content of a resolution to the boards fro discussion, but in this case, having two, make that three posts to this resolution is indeed three too many.

:headbang: Perhaps we should scrap this whole "sex" thing all toghether. Let's feed everyone a healthy diet of sexual supressants, and develop the means to clone people in nice healthy clone tanks. Then we can color code the people according to their level of security, and have a logical computer system in charge of everything. The computer is your friend.

:mad: :cool: :) :rolleyes: :( :confused:

"The Wanking Genius of Pineapple Joe-bot"

See, if there were British mods who cared, this nation might get squished for profanity. Or possibly on the grounds of being unnervingly strange...

"Wanking" ? Actually, that is the only valid word which could describe the content of this proposal. The writer is a wanker, and should only hope that the Proposal to protect people with 'mental handicaps' passes. Namely, because, if this proposal were to pass, the UN would be extinct. No UN nation would have population increases, and we would slowly die out at the hands of the massive plethora of non-UN nations (not to mention the exodus en masse of UN members who agree that the said proposal writer is a wanker). The only positive aspect, is that the remaining UN members would all be equal wankers to the proposal writer, so it would serve to cleanse the human gene pool of their appearantly defective DNA.

In addition, the proposal is likely to be deleted for violating the rules. And this could likely "eliminate" the individual proposing such, that is, if the moderators follow their own rules. This proposal is in violation of NSUN Resolution #7. And thereby would technically be classified an "ammendment or repeal" and subject to invalidation under that rule.


Sexual Freedom
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights Strength: Strong Proposed by: Armstrongonia
Description: What goes on between two (or more) consenting adults in the privacy of their homes should not be the concern of the state unless it is neccesary to enquire about the afore mentioned activities for medical reasons (e.g. if the individuals wish to give blood etc.).

Votes For: 2538

Votes Against: 318

Implemented: Thu Mar 13 2003

I'm thinking that the proposal author is signalling their alternative means of gratification once the heterosexual act is prohibited.

Ahem. We appear to be approaching the gutter...

This is a terrible idea. Ban the vast majority of people from "getting hitched?"

"The Wanking Genius of Pineapple Joe-bot"
Evil Minions: 17 (Pineapple Joe-bot, Saniuqa, Dag Yo, Bacrum-Valeria, The Playboy Mistress, Simstonia, Girl on Girl on Male, Sovereign UN Territory, People of Iran, Holberg, Suburban Freedom, Islamist Terrists, The Pointing Monkey, Saccharin, LLJK, Tubesock, Unlimited)
Perhaps I should have been a bit more obvious in marking my 'creative' edits to the author's original proposal ...

Perhaps I should have been a bit more obvious in marking my 'creative' edits to the author's original proposal ...


Evil Minions: 17 (Pineapple Joe-bot, Saniuqa, Dag Yo, Bacrum-Valeria, The Playboy Mistress, Simstonia, Girl on Girl on Male, Sovereign UN Territory, People of Iran, Holberg, Suburban Freedom, Islamist Terrists, The Pointing Monkey, Saccharin, LLJK, Tubesock, Unlimited)

I noticed a few other things myself. :)

* The Rep of Komokom looks grave,

And, if you look closer into the list of those who endorsed it, peer closer ... and look to where they inhabit, you may start to see another, rather disturbing trend ... it seems we must be vigilant

Hahahaha, this one is brilliant!

And the proposal in question has no vanished ...

There is still the rule of law and order even in this place ...

And mIRC has The Mod Cave channel too ... ;)

I noticed a few other things myself. :)
Those I didn't edit. They're all (or at least WERE all) legitimate nations.

Those I didn't edit. They're all (or at least WERE all) legitimate nations.

I wasn't saying you edited them. I was just noting that there were some interesting nations who were endorsing the proposal. I find it especially interesting that Unlimited and Sovereign UN Territory endorsed it. The others make more sense. Actually, even Unlimited's endorsement of it probably isn't all that strange. From what I've see of his(?) behavior, anyway. I think the chap is a little crazy. That's my non-professional opinion of course. ;)

Oops. I just assumed... ah, well. So wanking is a word that makes sense to Americans now? I'm mildly surprised.

So wanking is a word that makes sense to Americans now? I'm mildly surprised.
There are a few literate Americans, believe it or not. Some of us can recognize colourful language in a variety of dialects, even. Bloody brilliant, eh?

There are a few literate Americans, believe it or not. Some of us can recognize colourful language in a variety of dialects, even. Bloody brilliant, eh?

Wow. Thanks for destroying my entire belief system :p. Bloody brilliant my arse...



Hey, this resolution actually makes quite a bit of sense if you're a homosexual who wants more people to choose from. Maybe... nah. I won't go into that territory.

Yes, from my old USN days, I know "colorful metaphors" (to pull the ST:IV term) and obscene gestures in more than 7 different languages and cultures :D

"Ah, say, Woopert! Those bally colonials have started learning the mother tongue."

"About bloody time, Algie. Taken the vulgar oiks long enough. Now if only they would sort out the hideous piss they call beer, there might be a chance of them attaining a moderate level of civilisation, what?"

"I wather doubt that, Woopert! Ahahahaha."

"Harrumph. Very good, Algie. Bainbridge?"

"Sir?"

"Do be a sport and fetch us another round of tea, there's a good fellow."

"Very good, sir."

"Ah, say, Woopert! Those bally colonials have started learning the mother tongue."

"About bloody time, Algie. Taken the vulgar oiks long enough. Now if only they would sort out the hideous piss they call beer, there might be a chance of them attaining a moderate level of civilisation, what?"

"I wather doubt that, Woopert! Ahahahaha."

"Harrumph. Very good, Algie. Bainbridge?"

"Sir?"

"Do be a sport and fetch us another round of tea, there's a good fellow."

"Very good, sir."

Hullo there! It was you what done the blag, eh?

"Ah, say, Woopert! Those bally colonials have started learning the mother tongue."

"About bloody time, Algie. Taken the vulgar oiks long enough. Now if only they would sort out the hideous piss they call beer, there might be a chance of them attaining a moderate level of civilisation, what?"

"I wather doubt that, Woopert! Ahahahaha."

"Harrumph. Very good, Algie. Bainbridge?"

"Sir?"

"Do be a sport and fetch us another round of tea, there's a good fellow."

"Very good, sir."
I agree totally old chap
bally good what what