NationStates Jolt Archive


UN Resolution: Destroy The Environment

Craptaculous
27-07-2004, 23:36
This is the UN resolution, dubbed "Destroy the Environment." The gist is, we will live gloriously for 50 years, or there abouts, and then all of our delicious living will cause our collapse as a race. Please approve of this in the proposals section!

I propose that all of our industries work hard to pollute our planet, until Earth is completely uninhabitable.

Over the Next 50 years we will live decadently slaughtering all animals, and only eating the most minute part of the animal, labeling it an "aphrodesiac."

****This will of course lead to the extinction of all species and rampant human sexual intercourse throughout our planet.*****

Soon, the limited agricultural food supply will be depleted due to soil exhaustion (which will be made mandatory) and all of the new babies will eat our new food supply until we dont have anymore food anywhere on the planet, then of course we will turn and eat the babies that were just born, a practice common in China (fetus soup), and when all of the babies are digested,

***eat eachother ending the glorious existence of the human race.***
Libereco
28-07-2004, 00:31
This i really ridiculous!

Libereco saves its environment and so do other nations!
Voroziniya
28-07-2004, 00:42
I personally believe that the proposal is idiotic, harmful, senseless, and fruitless, and will make no contribution except for the exhaustion of the environment, and with that, the welfare of the human race. If the entire environment goes down, so do we. We must protect what is necissay for survival, which lies mostly in our environment. The proposal is certainly unworthy of the UN's attention.

However, I also believe that too strong an environmental protection program is bad. Although a protected environment is ultimately good for humans, we have great need to take advantage of some of it. We must preserve it as not to exhaust it, but we must also use it to advance mankind, and not keep it around simply to admire its beauty. Not to mention extra funds for environmental protection could be used more effectively. That is why I am personally against logging bans, and similar laws.

Therefore I believe it is up to the nation how much it wants to preserve or use its environment and this proposal is a distraction from other, more important issues.

The United Socialist States of voroziniya
Destructo Killem
28-07-2004, 01:01
What is he on? :confused:
Flibbleites
28-07-2004, 07:34
Somebody PLEASE tell me that this wasn't submitted.
Komokom
28-07-2004, 07:56
1) Not worthy of N.S.U.N. time.

2) If already sent in, will probably lead to a warning of some sort.

3) It did at least live up to the name of its creator ... " Craptaculous "

:rolleyes:
Voroziniya
28-07-2004, 15:45
Obviously this was meant to be a joke--all nations have the same opinion on it--don't justify it by responding to it anymore.

The United Socialist States of Voroziniya
Finnish Technocracy
28-07-2004, 19:00
Archbishop Aosar, from Finnish Technocracy replies;

No!
Nova Sol
28-07-2004, 19:59
Ahhh! Soylent Green is made out of people!! :eek:

Interesting* idea.
(*As in being completely insane is interesting)

So basically it's screw the enviroment. Well, I think we all know how this works out. Pretty soon we'll run out of algae too. And then what? Extreme cannibalism, depleted ozone layer... A utopia!