NationStates Jolt Archive

There's a proposal that's just been proposed ( by me ) to get rid of nudist beaches. I think it's a good one, so go and read it if you're a UN member. And if your a delegate, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE vote for it. I want to get a proposal voted for, for once.
Thank you.

The Christian South will glady badger her regional delegate to support your resolution. The strong language used against nudist beaches might not win approval, but its a good resolution. Maybe something more restrictive can work...prehaps a heavy tax for nudist beaches or increased punishments for public exposure?

but I like nudist beaches. . . .

*goes off to sulk*

but I like nudist beaches. . . .

*goes off to sulk*
:roll: everyone has their own opinion. you can like it if u want. no one is stopping u. :twisted:
he he he!!

Whats wrong with the beaches in question?

ill get my delegate to vote for the anti-nutist beach thing...

No More Nudist Beaches
A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.

Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Significant
Proposed: Costa Simona

Description: Worldwide, our beaches are being littered with nudists, showing everyone their god-given personal body parts in the name of a good tan or an enjoyable day.

This passtime has more detraments than it is acknowledged for;

1) Families on vacation get a rude shock when they take their children to beach for a swim, and discover that it is a 'clothing optional' beach.

2) The nudity at the beach promotes the idea of 'no rules, no restraints' and leads to other immoralities, including drug use, violence, alcohol in excessive amounts, and rape.

3) These beaches are unhygenic, and people can catch AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases, by merely going in the water, or sitting on a contaminated bench. Also, unprotected sexual intercourse is commonplace at nudist beaches, and unwanted pregnancies leading to abortions, regularly occur.

4) The sense of decency is lost. The days when your private parts were considered sacred are disappearing. Now, more and more people are of the opinion that it is acceptable to let your sacred parts be seen in public.

This proposal will shut down all nudist beaches - and resorts. It will put a ban on public nudity, unless under special provisional license, such as in the event of making a film or a documentary.

Nudist beaches are unhygenic, immoral, and leads to other immoral acts.



Honourable member of Costa Simona, in future please note it is good etiquette to paste a copy of your proposal in the thread and also please run it through a spell check to avoid embarrassment.

My first thought is that this is a national issue and we already have a daily issue to cover this topic. I therefore see no reason for the UN to cover it also.

Point 1 – I can see how this may happen, but equally there are many family beaches in many nations, so I feel if parents are concerned then simply check the beaches before hand.

Point 2 – What utter nonsense. I challenge you provide any back up for this argument. The last time I went to a beach I did not see a rapist running round, raping people with a needle stuck in their arm and a bottle of vodka in the other. I jest, but I am quite serious nudity does not directly lead to rape, drug use or violence.

Point 3 – I’m sorry; did you just say that I am going to get a STD by simply swimming in the water by nudist beach? I really think if the honourable member believes that, then the sex education in Costa Simona must be in a very sorry state. Also, one cannot force an individual to have protected sex, one can only educate and no amount of banning nudist beaches will ever stop unprotected sex. The state's responsibility here is not to condemn, but to provide individuals with the tools to make an informed decision.

Finally, matters of decency and morality are matter for each individual nation to decide, it is not for the UN to force any one governments position on member states.

The government of Telidia will not support a proposal that so blatantly infringe on the civil liberties of our people and will result in undermining our sex education programs.

Respectfully
Lydia Cornwall, UN Ambassador
HM Government of Telidia

Argh, once again Telidia gets in before me, lol. Twice now ! :D

My arguments :

No More Nudist Beaches

A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.

Category: Moral Decency

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Costa Simona

Oh goody ... More moral " decency " ... :roll:

Description: Worldwide, our beaches are being littered with nudists, showing everyone their god-given personal body parts in the name of a good tan or an enjoyable day.

Cause remember kids, enjoying life is a sin to burn in hell for ...

:roll:

This passtime has more detraments than it is acknowledged for;

GASP, Surely you don't mean * SUN BURN * :shock:

1) Families on vacation get a rude shock when they take their children to beach for a swim, and discover that it is a 'clothing optional' beach.

Such families should learn to read signs and maps, and actually have a clue as to where they are going.

These families sound almost like people who complain to a coffee shop when they spill their coffee and some-how get burned ... Or those people who break into a house, cut their hands on shards from the glass window they broke to get in, get caught and try to sue for damages ... Well, now I can see who is responsible for raising them ...

2) The nudity at the beach promotes the idea of 'no rules, no restraints' and leads to other immoralities, including drug use, violence, alcohol in excessive amounts, and rape.

That folks, is not even worth my time ... :wink:

3) These beaches are unhygenic, and people can catch AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases, by merely going in the water, or sitting on a contaminated bench. Also, unprotected sexual intercourse is commonplace at nudist beaches, and unwanted pregnancies leading to abortions, regularly occur.

This how-ever, just begs to be ripped into.

:roll: + :roll: + :roll:

For all your lip service to morality, you seem to have no grasp of the common value of honesty. I despair for those who must suffer you. Might I add, abortions are already legal and protected under U.N. Law. So there.

:wink:

* In fact, reading again, I would have to call you ignorant or a plain liar.

4) The sense of decency is lost. The days when your private parts were considered sacred are disappearing. Now, more and more people are of the opinion that it is acceptable to let your sacred parts be seen in public.

The sky is falling, the sky is falling !

Yes, sarcasm, just one of the many services I offer ... :wink:

This proposal will shut down all nudist beaches - and resorts. It will put a ban on public nudity, unless under special provisional license, such as in the event of making a film or a documentary.

No. Because your proposal is utter rubbish and needs chucking out.

Nudist beaches are unhygenic, immoral, and leads to other immoral acts.

Pfffrt.

" Demands of mindless subjection to it on command, willing ignorance to reality and circumstance, and all the loathsome nonsense that goes by the name of extremist morality, how passionately I hate them. "

- T.R. Kom.

There, and I've already covered the " unhygenic " B.S. :wink:

With an apology to dear Albert ... :wink:

Take your proposal down to the nudist sand surf and sun, and do what is right.

Fold into a paper boat, sail it, and then sink it, before we sink it here.

:wink:

- T.R. Kom
Le Représentant de Komokom.
Ministre Régional de Substance.
http://www.nationstates.net/images/flags/uploads/komokom.jpg (http://www.pipian.com/stuffforchat/gdpcalc.php?nation=komokom)
<- Not A Moderator, Just A Know It All.
" Clowns To The Left of Me ... Jokers To The Right, Here I am ... "
" Don't you have a life ? " ( pause ) " Silly question I suppose ... "

The dsh opposes this proposal.

First of all, the writing and the spelling is....well, plain awful. I mean is it that difficult to run the damn proposal through a spellchecker?

Secondly, it's inaccurate.

The nudity at the beach promotes the idea of 'no rules, no restraints' and leads to other immoralities, including drug use, violence, alcohol in excessive amounts, and rape.

Most "nudists" tend to be in the 50's or 60's....I doubt many people want to rape people in that age bracket, what with sagging and wrinkles and all :o

Plus the idea that people in that age range are drugged up.... :roll:

And I'd argue that liberal nations with such an attitude and well educated on such matters will suffer less from these problems, as opposed to conservative nations with their heads in the sand.

These beaches are unhygenic, and people can catch AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases, by merely going in the water, or sitting on a contaminated bench.

Now you are just being silly. You really don't know the first thing about transmission of AIDS do you? It sounds like you come from one of those nations with their head in the sand....you poor uneducated chap....come to hirota's universities and you'll learn a lot about such matters, and alcohol, but we won't get into that right now :)

Also, unprotected sexual intercourse is commonplace at nudist beaches, and unwanted pregnancies leading to abortions, regularly occur.

It sounds like someone HOPES that nudist beaches are like this....Honestly, if you want to have sex with a grandmother, I'm sure you can without offending anyone.

The sense of decency is lost.

Actually, it sounds like the sense of persective and reality is lost.

Nudist beaches are unhygenic, immoral, and leads to other immoral acts.

Next you'll be banning skirts in the style of taliban :roll:

This proposal gets an unequivocal thumbs down
________________________
Ambassador Hirosami Kildarno
http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/2702/hirotabanner.jpg (http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/30626/page=display_nation/nation=hirota)http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/6355/england2.jpg (http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/04605/page=display_region/region=england)

3) These beaches are unhygenic, and people can catch AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases, by merely going in the water, or sitting on a contaminated bench. Also, unprotected sexual intercourse is commonplace at nudist beaches, and unwanted pregnancies leading to abortions, regularly occur.1) Someone must have failed sex ed, 2) On what nudist beach can you see people having sex and can you give me driving directions?

And the age of your typical nudist varies on where ya are. In australia (famous for their australian style bikini) nudists (at least in winter time) seem to be overweight middle aged men.

And in defense of that first point of the resolution, (even though its stupid) because in some areas, idiots like the fellow who wrote the resolution are common, so nudist beaches don't really advertise. I had a very intelligent government teacher who accidentally showed up at a nudist beach.

3) These beaches are unhygenic, and people can catch AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases, by merely going in the water, or sitting on a contaminated bench. Also, unprotected sexual intercourse is commonplace at nudist beaches, and unwanted pregnancies leading to abortions, regularly occur.


OK, for those of you who failed THIRD GRADE HEALTH CLASS, let me just say this. You can not catch a sexually transmitted disease by swimming in the same water as someone or sitting on the same beach as someone. They are called sexually transmitted diseases for a reason. Also, let me say that the UN is not here to solve moral issues. That is for our own country to decide what is moral and what is immoral. THe UN has no place talking about this type of stuff.


Kazooland

I think it's a sad proposal.


we're all naked in the eyes of god ! you religious frigides...

if people are shocked seeing a 2 year old kid running around naked,
then there is something wrong with the people themselves, NOT the kid
or the parrents.

Naked does not mean SEX !!!

The Confederacy of Mattikistan agrees with the honourable representative of Telidia on this matter. This proposal should not even reach the voting stage, let alone become a resolution. And as some people have already said, albeit in a more 'colourful' manner, your reasoning is flawed.
The Prime Minister himself had a chuckle at point 3. Tell me, how exactly is it that swimming trunks would prevent this even if it were possible? Or are we to wear sexual protection when we go swimming now?
The Confederacy Government respectfully disregards your proposal, and would certainly vote against it if it somehow made it that far.

I agree most certainly.... not with the resolution, with the fact that the writer has serious educational problems...

Ok, to educate the proposal writter. AIDS is not a desease you can "catch" by any means. AIDS (Auto-Immune Deficency Syndrome) is just that A SYNDROME, the symptoms of a disease, a virus.... This virus is called HIV (human immuno-definiciency virus). HIV is an interesting little devil in it's construction.... it's a small segment of RNA (ribo-neucleic acid) spiralled around a small protien rod. This is different then most virus' in that they usually are incased in a protien shell. This also makes the virus' in itself barely survivable except in extreamly specific conditions. Exposure to air, seawater, high temperatures and much more then 105F will cause the RNA to break down rapidly in HIV. This means contact with hot beach sand, seawater, and... AIR even will destroy the virus. The virus can only be transmitted through an exchange of extreamly specific bodily fluids, most notably blood, semen, or vaginal fluids. While it is present in minute quantities in saliva it breaks down too rapidly to cause infection, it also will exist in minute quantities in mothers breast milk, however still, an infants saliva will break it down too rapidly for infection, stomach acid will take care of the rest. Blood transfusions (in addition to minute tranfusions through dirty needles by addicts) and the exchange of fluids in the act of sexual intercourse are the only ways by which this virus can be spread from one person to another.

AIDS comes into play when the virus begins acting upon the individual. HIV specifically attacks the cells within the human body designed to develop anti-bodies to fight off bacteriological and virus related infections... these are called "Helper T-cells". HIV will attach itself to these cells, inject it's RNA segment into the cell, which then bonds into the DNA segment in the cells nucleus. This reprograms the cell into a little HIV factory, and destroys the normal use of the cell, and eventually the cell itself. As the infection spreads, the lack of these cells leads to an overall inability of the body to combat other bacteriological and virus related infections. So the person begins suffering from a wide range of common ailments resultant from the fact they no longer possess the capacity to combat these infections at the cell level. This is when the SYMPTOM of HIV's attack becomes present in the form of what is known as AIDS.

I agree most certainly.... not with the resolution, with the fact that the writer has serious educational problems...

Ok, to educate the proposal writter. AIDS is not a desease you can "catch" by any means. AIDS (Auto-Immune Deficency Syndrome) is just that A SYNDROME, the symptoms of a disease, a virus.... This virus is called HIV (human immuno-definiciency virus). HIV is an interesting little devil in it's construction.... it's a small segment of RNA (ribo-neucleic acid) spiralled around a small protien rod. This is different then most virus' in that they usually are incased in a protien shell. This also makes the virus' in itself barely survivable except in extreamly specific conditions. Exposure to air, seawater, high temperatures and much more then 105F will cause the RNA to break down rapidly in HIV. This means contact with hot beach sand, seawater, and... AIR even will destroy the virus. The virus can only be transmitted through an exchange of extreamly specific bodily fluids, most notably blood, semen, or vaginal fluids. While it is present in minute quantities in saliva it breaks down too rapidly to cause infection, it also will exist in minute quantities in mothers breast milk, however still, an infants saliva will break it down too rapidly for infection, stomach acid will take care of the rest. Blood transfusions (in addition to minute tranfusions through dirty needles by addicts) and the exchange of fluids in the act of sexual intercourse are the only ways by which this virus can be spread from one person to another.

AIDS comes into play when the virus begins acting upon the individual. HIV specifically attacks the cells within the human body designed to develop anti-bodies to fight off bacteriological and virus related infections... these are called "Helper T-cells". HIV will attach itself to these cells, inject it's RNA segment into the cell, which then bonds into the DNA segment in the cells nucleus. This reprograms the cell into a little HIV factory, and destroys the normal use of the cell, and eventually the cell itself. As the infection spreads, the lack of these cells leads to an overall inability of the body to combat other bacteriological and virus related infections. So the person begins suffering from a wide range of common ailments resultant from the fact they no longer possess the capacity to combat these infections at the cell level. This is when the SYMPTOM of HIV's attack becomes present in the form of what is known as AIDS.

Costa Simona, I don't mean to be rude, but your proposal is an affront to civil rights. While local governments may have stringent starndards regarding displays of nudity, I cannot see how applying this to all nations could possibly improve morality.

I would love to see any statistics stating that nations that allow nude beaches and resorts have higher rates of sexual assault or other crimes.

The misinformation that you labor under regarding the transmission of HIV has already been addressed. Please take the time to educate yourself regarding this matter. This was covered quite widely in the 1980's and early 90's, and the correct information has been widely available since then.

3) These beaches are unhygenic, and people can catch AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases, by merely going in the water, or sitting on a contaminated bench. Also, unprotected sexual intercourse is commonplace at nudist beaches, and unwanted pregnancies leading to abortions, regularly occur.


OK, for those of you who failed THIRD GRADE HEALTH CLASS, let me just say this. You can not catch a sexually transmitted disease by swimming in the same water as someone or sitting on the same beach as someone. They are called sexually transmitted diseases for a reason. Also, let me say that the UN is not here to solve moral issues. That is for our own country to decide what is moral and what is immoral. THe UN has no place talking about this type of stuff.


Kazooland

I totally agree with you. However, we are already forced to have abortion. Abortion is a moral issue that should've been decided by the states and not a world body.

However, the guy of this proposal must've failed every class in health or missed them or both. SEXually TRANSmitted Diseases are caused by the first three letter of the word you used. LOL

Nudist beaches aren't bad at all. Most people do know where they're at if they lived in the area for awhile. And yes they can sometimes be found in tourist magazines.

Honestly, I have no problem with nudist beaches. I don't know why you're making a big deal out of it. If you don't like nudist beaches, go somewhere else.

I totally agree with you. However, we are already forced to have abortion. Abortion is a moral issue that should've been decided by the states and not a world body.We are not forced to have abortions, that would be like some wierd little man with all the equipment required to perform an abortion skulking in an alley waiting to assault any pregnant woman that passes by. Also, in certain circumstances I believe it is okay for the UN to pass resolutions restricting civil rights in sake of decency, but when the definition of "decency" is being decided by a misinformed, poorly educated creep, then something needs to be said. I think we all can agree on certain things being amoral, murder for example.

1) Families on vacation get a rude shock when they take their children to beach for a swim, and discover that it is a 'clothing optional' beach.

Have you BEEN to a nude beach? They are hard to access and there are signs everywhere saying "clothing optional." If some stupid family goes there anyway, that is their fault.

2) The nudity at the beach promotes the idea of 'no rules, no restraints' and leads to other immoralities, including drug use, violence, alcohol in excessive amounts, and rape.

WHAT?????? Being naked leads to drugs??? Slippery slope my friend.

3) These beaches are unhygenic, and people can catch AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases, by merely going in the water, or sitting on a contaminated bench. Also, unprotected sexual intercourse is commonplace at nudist beaches, and unwanted pregnancies leading to abortions, regularly occur.

Last time I checked, bathing suits weren't hermetically sealed, so I fail to see how your risk of catching disease rises when you go in the water.

President Letizia

3) These beaches are unhygenic, and people can catch AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases, by merely going in the water, or sitting on a contaminated bench. Also, unprotected sexual intercourse is commonplace at nudist beaches, and unwanted pregnancies leading to abortions, regularly occur.


OK, for those of you who failed THIRD GRADE HEALTH CLASS, let me just say this. You can not catch a sexually transmitted disease by swimming in the same water as someone or sitting on the same beach as someone. They are called sexually transmitted diseases for a reason.


Kazooland

Not to mention the fact that, even if STD's could be transmitted trough water, wearing a bathing suit isn't going to stop it. :roll:

Get rid of nudist beaches? You're kidding, right? People who might be offended should know the location of these beaches, so they don't get offended. I don't think its a big deal. Make a wall or something. One side is the nudist beach, and the other is clothing required side.

There's a proposal that's just been proposed ( by me ) to get rid of nudist beaches. I think it's a good one, so go and read it if you're a UN member. And if your a delegate, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE vote for it. I want to get a proposal voted for, for once.
Thank you.

So ban nude beaches in your country, you are just obsessed with getting some random resolution passed. I don't like nude beaches but I'm not trying to tell everyone else to agree.

In the People's Republic of Lemurya there a lot of nude beaches, well signalized and as paradisiac as any other Lemuryan beach. In fact, the nude beaches are one of the country's most important turistic hooks and a reflect of the Lemuryan roots and culture.

Pleeeeease, do not make nudity a taboo. Lemurya will always be against any judeo-christian taboos fruit of centuries of monotheistic and inquisitorial religious opression.

The People's Republic of Lemurya.

This text is both in English and Lemuryan Català to reflect the broad range of languages and cultures within UN. Answer it in English or in both, so we will understand each other and be understood.



(A la República Popular de Lemúria hi han un munt de platges nudistes, ben senyalitzades i tant paradisíaques com qualsevol altre platja a Lemúria. De fet, les platges nudistes són un del més importants atractius turístics del país i un reflexe de les arrels i cultura lemuriana.
Si-us-plau, no facin del nu un tabú. Lemúria sempre estarà en contra de qualsevol tabú judeo-cristià fruit de segles d'opressió religiosa monoteista i inquissicional.

La República Popular de Lemúria.

Aquest text està en anglés i en català lemurià per reflexar l'ampli espectre de llengües i cultures de les NN.UU. Respongui'l en anglés o en les dues llengües, a fi d'entrendre'ns i ésser entessos.)

Holy....Christ.......

Who the hell came up with this post anyway? I am absolutely shocked. So let me see if I got this strait....

1. The UN is already DICTATING for us whether or not we are allowed to let our countries perform abortions....

2. Now I am suppose to tell my people "Hey, sorry, but the UN said 'no nude beaches anymore', so everyone pack it up..."?

Hell no, that's what I say. I'll be damn if I will let this resolution pass. It is the biggest bunch of crap to come before the UN since the abortion business. What is the UN short for? United Nations or Slave Nations? While Slave Nations does not have the abreviation of UN, it carries the same meaning.
The UN has NO business telling me how I am going to run my country morally. No, you cannot catch STDs from being in the same water naked....no, you cannot tell me that there are no signs up (or lack thereof) saying "Clothing Optional"......and no, you cannot tell me that I am suppose to tell my people that they can no longer go to a beach and express themselves as they please. I myself, while not the most attractive person in the world, am quite comfortable being nude in front of others, and fully support nude beaches. They DO NOT support the idea of sex, drugs, or other common-sence taboos. I actually pity those who were raised to be modest of thier bodies. God gave us these bodies so that we would have a life. How we choose to use them is up to us as individuals, NOT THE UN! I have said it once, and I will say it again until the message is clear: I WILL NOT be intimidated by the UN FOR ANY REASON! If they choose to pass this utter rubish, then they are making a grave tactical error on imposing on other's moral rights as FREE people. Note the word "FREE". I was under the impression that the UN encouraged freedom? If so, then they will clearly see that this proposal is utter crap and will shuck it from the ballot boxes immediately. They will also send a memo to the sponsoring countries, slapping and beating them unmercifully for wasting thier times on such stupid proposals. If you do not want nude beaches/resorts in your country, THAT IS YOUR BUSINESS, NOT EVERYONE ELSE'S. End of story, and no more to be said.

-Regards,

Commander-General Vlad Pryde
~=*****=~

The Christian South will glady badger her regional delegate to support your resolution. The strong language used against nudist beaches might not win approval, but its a good resolution. Maybe something more restrictive can work...prehaps a heavy tax for nudist beaches or increased punishments for public exposure?

I am very much in favor of an increased tax on the nudist beaches. I also urge a mandatory fence at least 7 feet high be built around all nudist beach property.

I'm not...screw taxes! If a fence is to be put up, fine. But taxes? Answer me this:

Was Adam and Eve taxed for being nude in the Garden of Eden? No? Then how can you tax US for being nude? I don't think so; it doesn't work that way. This rediculus proposal should only be for individual countries to do as they see fit. On this particular matter, it is not right for the UN to impose a law like this that effects everyone. In my country, if you don't like something, then you don't do it (or in this case, you don't go to it). That includes nude beaches. I mean, Jesus.....this is like those morons who are trying to stop other people from getting gay marriages, when it is NONE OF THIER BUSINESS on how those people choose to live thier lives. Now, you may asking yourselves how this ties into nude beaches. It doesn't......BUT, the principle is still the same.

So, bottom line: This is just one more example that someone decided that they knew what's best for everyone, and are now trying to force it upon us. Stay out of MORAL issues. They are just too controversial, and would never completely work. Let's stick to those issues which do effect us more or worse, such as The Nuclear Arms Race, fighting terrorism, cleaning up the world, worrying whether or not a country is going to invade or go to war with another region, etc. Those are important issues, NOT NUDE BEACHES! Honestly, it's just a waste of time.

-Regards,

Commander-General Vlad Pryde
~=*****=~

There's a proposal that's just been proposed ( by me ) to get rid of nudist beaches. I think it's a good one, so go and read it if you're a UN member. And if your a delegate, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE vote for it. I want to get a proposal voted for, for once.
Thank you.

Baptist Christian Conservative we are but we are not supporting this, the right to free expression is one that the world should hold dear.

Nude beaches are just that: beaches that are exclusively nude, in other words, a well-orchestrated one is not truly public, and therefore there is no harm done to those offended easily by nudity.

Oh. good heavens, we should certainly ban them! After all, you can't have people doing what they want and, possibly, enjoying themselves in the process where Christians might see them and be offended! Ban beaches altogether, I say. They're dangerous, and tempt people to licentious and lewd and liberal activities, such as paddling, sun bathing, building sand castles, and eating ice cream. While you're about it, ban ice cream as well. And being out in the sunshine.

Oh. good heavens, we should certainly ban them! After all, you can't have people doing what they want and, possibly, enjoying themselves in the process where Christians might see them and be offended! Ban beaches altogether, I say. They're dangerous, and tempt people to licentious and lewd and liberal activities, such as paddling, sun bathing, building sand castles, and eating ice cream. While you're about it, ban ice cream as well. And being out in the sunshine.


Stupid donkey, you try and make another insult on Christianity, or any religion, like that again, and you will feel it.

To polarize with religion is to feel ignorance of the highest degree.

After all, you can't have people doing what they want and, possibly, enjoying themselves in the process where Christians might see them and be offended! Ban beaches altogether, I say...
Stupid donkey, you try and make another insult on Christianity, or any religion, like that again, and you will feel it.

Not a big fan of sarcasm are you? :?
________________________
Ambassador Hirosami Kildarno
http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/2702/hirotabanner.jpg (http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/30626/page=display_nation/nation=hirota)http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/6355/england2.jpg (http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/04605/page=display_region/region=england)

*Walks into room naked*

Damn Strait, I say....I am a christian (born again, mind you) and I find that quite insulting. To say that being christian means that you can't be nude? Am I the only one besides Quarka who sees the idiocy around here? Once again...another fine example of people trying to dictate what's best for everyone else. If you don't want nude beaches in YOUR country, then bann them. But DO NOT try and push your views onto others.
I see absolutely nothing wrong with nudity, and will continue to support nudist resorts and beaches throughout the world. Mind you, I won't try and push idiotic legislation through the UN to accomplish my goals.

*Turns around and walks back to office*

*Walks into room naked*

Damn Strait, I say....I am a christian (born again, mind you) and I find that quite insulting. To say that being christian means that you can't be nude? Am I the only one besides Quarka who sees the idiocy around here? Once again...another fine example of people trying to dictate what's best for everyone else. If you don't want nude beaches in YOUR country, then bann them. But DO NOT try and push your views onto others.
I see absolutely nothing wrong with nudity, and will continue to support nudist resorts and beaches throughout the world. Mind you, I won't try and push idiotic legislation through the UN to accomplish my goals.

*Turns around and walks back to office*


In RL in California they recently opened a Christian Nudist Resort.


So long as it isn't sexually oriented I don't see why it would be wrong.