NationStates Jolt Archive

the un should have one army

why

1 no more war without un consent
2 no members attacking other members
3 UN stands stronger
4 Nations with no founds are also defended

how:
every nation makes a contribution of recrutes and money
( the bigger the member, the bigger the contributoin)

No I already proposed somthing like that and it was stupid.
It's my nation and I can blow up another nation if I see fit.

that will have you killed

I wasnt' saying that.
What I ment was I'm not going to try to protect the UN.
it's 20,000 to 90,000
We wouldn't have a chance

the bigger the member, the bigger the contributoin

Some nations are fairly large but couldn't afford to contribute that much - like us - we have a poor economy and a very pacifist stance, so no money or troops to contirbute.

Plus it's just a bad idea.

bad idea. the world views are so differnent from country to country that if a country secretly stockpiled then invaded the vote to defend the country being invaded. witch has no army cause the un says so. would never happen the country would be invaded and by the time the un actually does somthing about it the invaded country is already singing the new national anthem.

bad idea. the world views are so differnent from country to country that if a country secretly stockpiled then invaded the vote to defend the country being invaded. witch has no army cause the un says so. would never happen the country would be invaded and by the time the un actually does somthing about it the invaded country is already singing the new national anthem.

bad idea. the world views are so differnent from country to country that if a country secretly stockpiled then invaded the vote to defend the country being invaded. witch has no army cause the un says so. would never happen the country would be invaded and by the time the un actually does somthing about it the invaded country is already singing the new national anthem.