NationStates Jolt Archive

The Armed Republic of Akrasia and its allies finds this resolution to be in direct violation of an earlier resolution which has already been passed and put into affect by the UN (The very..first..one).

Therefore, our region, the RSA, will respectfully refuse to aknowledge such an Anti-Arms Doctrine, even if passed.

This is a legitimate action considering that pre-existing passed resolutions should always supersede newer ones in the case of a contridiction. This assumption is made evident by current UN procedural laws which dictates that resolutions involving a change in Game Mechanics is illegal. A contridiction would in affect be asking for a repeal of an earlier resolution, or an amendment.

Rendering all UN members defenseless against non-member nations is idiocy, and its affects will do nothing but promote instability worldwide--both economically and politically.

-- Dictator Zen Archigos of the Armed Republic of Akrasia

Fight the Axis of Evil
A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.

Category: International Security Strength: Strong Proposed by: Maxtopia

Description: As the world becomes a more dangerous place, UN member nations must act swiftly in the interests of peace. This means, of course, building lots of new weapons. Only by massively increasing military budgets world-wide will we be able to restore peace and global security.

Votes For: 2

Votes Against: 1

Implemented: Tue Nov 12 2002
The current UN resolution is in direct violation of what Max Barry himself wrote.

we need weapons of mass destruction to level all of the evil in the worl d other wise we, the UN, will be demolished. i for one will go hypo against any1 hoo is for the stupid thing

Playing Devil's Advocate here, but there IS a way to reconcile the two proposals -- one can build many weapons and increase military budgets by shifting the military budget of our countries to more conventional weaponry. The first resolution never said that nuclear weapons were required, only more weapons of any type.

Minister Mar Darenka
Ambassador to the UN
The Most Serene Republic of Daryn

Playing Devil's Advocate here, but there IS a way to reconcile the two proposals -- one can build many weapons and increase military budgets by shifting the military budget of our countries to more conventional weaponry. The first resolution never said that nuclear weapons were required, only more weapons of any type.

Minister Mar Darenka
Ambassador to the UN
The Most Serene Republic of Daryn
What he said.

Well, if UN doesn't have nuclear weapons, non UN countries can just nuke our countries in a second.... I'm not sure non UN countries want to disarm from their nice nukes.

Anyway Reich of Metal, have spended a lot on weapon researching and now we have laser weapons and space marines, so we dont really need nukes. ^^U

There is already a thread in which to debate this resolution.


http://www.satanstephen.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DrChaotica.jpg (http://www.satanstephen.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/taunt1.mp3)
Myrth
Ruler of the Cosmos
Forum Moderator