NationStates Jolt Archive

Why can't we just allow people to have more than one nation in the UN because it has become a problem in some cases ths would alleviate most of them. :idea: :idea: :idea: :idea:

Asking for more than one UN member nation is like going a polling place and asking for two ballots! It's ridiculous! Even if one person has more than one vote, they are still swinging the resolution/election! It is unfair for one person to wield more power than others in a place that is supposed to be about equality.

A UN delegate with many endorsements does not follow this unfairness because OTHER UN nations have endorsed him, therefore showing their approval of the delegate's vote.

Why can't we just allow people to have more than one nation in the UN because it has become a problem in some cases ths would alleviate most of them.

What problem has occured because people are restricted to one UN member nation? How could having two or more UN member nations alleviate this problem? Please be specific because I do not understand how unfairness could lead to alleviating "problems".

More than on UN member nations leads itself to cheating, no matter what the story is behind it. Thus, allowing it would allow for more cheating and such in the delegacy role and in invasions/defenses.

I agree that it would be against the spirit of fair gamemanship.

if we were allowed to have more than one member nation dont u think that many people would start having more than one UN member nation and in a sense it would just double the votes and keep the votes at the same % for or against a topic. that is assuming of course that many people will do this

Yes, many people would start to have more than one UN nation. It would become an arms race to see who can create the most puppets and stuff the virtual ballot box most thoroughly.

Not going to happen.