NationStates Jolt Archive


No UN

Politalish
18-03-2004, 01:17
UN sucks I don't want them to run my country. If you agree lets form an allience. :twisted:
18-03-2004, 01:28
The collonisian government welcome the advocacy of the destruction and nuclear suicide bombings of the United nations and all who submit to their socialist views. We hereby welcome the alliance with the politalish, and reaferm our values of economic and political freedoms.
Komokom
18-03-2004, 02:49
UN sucks

No, the U.N. does not suck, not at all. What does suck, are pathetic little,

"This is my first post, oooh, look at me, I'm a mosquito biting the pinkie of the U.N. I am just so brave, kill the U.N. Kill it!"

Nations like yours who seem to think we honestly care when you waltz in with no previuos knowledge about how this place works and expect every one else to follow your every beck and call.

Rfffrt, yeah, right.

I don't want them to run my country.

They don't you idiot, you still remain in complete control of your country, being a member simply gives you the right to vote on law up for voting, and if it passes by a majority then it becomes 100% enforced by game mechanics not the U.N.

As before, learn the rules.

If you agree lets form an allience.

An alliance to do what exactly, smoke even greater quantities of pot? Cause thats what it looks like has been going on here, then again, maybe your going to move on to heavier drugs like your little friends next post?

The collonisian government welcome the advocacy of the destruction and nuclear suicide bombings of the United nations

After blinking repreatedly and trying to translate your manic raving, I worked out your proposing to "nuke" the U.N. with suicide attacks, thats great, your obviously no threat, if you think a suicide bombers going to walk into a non-existent building with a "nuke" strapped to his back, you've clearly no idea about nuclear weapons, logistics, security, or even foe that matter the effects of a nuclear weapon and its potent range.

And all who submit to their socialist views.

Well hello, I'm a democratic capitalist paradise with a liberal mind-set, does that make me an evil soccialist lap dog? Your a ninny, stop using terms you don't know the meaning of, it costs me time in shooting your half-assed posts down.

We hereby welcome the alliance with the politalish, and reaferm our values of economic and political freedoms.

In one sweeping line, you've demonstrated your zero level of knowledge on the U.N. and proven why I could justifiablycall you an ignorant noise maker and thus end my argument, but that would be unfair, many people reading this would wish you suffer further, and so for my fans the show must go on!

The U.N. is more then capable of increasing economic freedoms as well as political ones, a fact which previous passed proposals have proved. You can go read them yourself and work it out by your lone-some, if I try to inform you, you'll just block it out most likely...

See, your eyes are glazed completely now, the drugs your apparently on must be bringing you down...

In conclusion, test your nuke before you detonate it, I suggest it be just the two you, and the nuke, in an empty stretch of land in the middle of no-where, and detonate while making sure your standing right next to it.

It won't help you, but it sure will make thing quieter around here.

- The Rep of Komokom.

And consider yourself to be officially frying-panned.
18-03-2004, 02:51
I believe that the opinions that you have derived about the U.N. are completely unfair. Though I have posted in the past that the U.N. is unbalanced towards the democratic states, I still believe that the United Nations does not “suck”. The only problem with the organization is that it is based on the real U.N. The real, I hate to use that term, U.N. was originally supposed to be a group of nations that would accept different kinds of governments, but in the end, mostly democracies are the majority in the clan. I have always been a supporter of a separate organization in Nation States though. Since the U.N. will never truly balance out, a separate organization that would be more of a right-leaning group would truly balance out all of the nations that would like to belong to a large governing body. The best thing about the U.N. though, is that IT’S OPTIONAL! If you don’t like them, don’t join them.
Dictator of Steel Skarmories
East Hackney
18-03-2004, 02:52
Thanks for the loan of the frying pan, Komokom. Here, have it back...we think you need it...
Komokom
18-03-2004, 03:03
* The Rep of Komokom re-takes the frying-pan, sacred instrument of justice which it is known as far and wide... :wink:

"Thank you East Hackney, I darn'd well do I think..."

* Grins,

"Don't make me come over there Steel skarmories!" :wink:

- The Rep of Komokom.
18-03-2004, 05:36
UN sucks

No, the U.N. does not suck, not at all. What does suck, are pathetic little,

"This is my first post, oooh, look at me, I'm a mosquito biting the pinkie of the U.N. I am just so brave, kill the U.N. Kill it!"

Nations like yours who seem to think we honestly care when you waltz in with no previuos knowledge about how this place works and expect every one else to follow your every beck and call.

Rfffrt, yeah, right.

in all honesty, distinguished representitive of Komokom, i do not believe that neither the Politalish kind, nor I, were trying to sway anybody to our views. we were merely trying to find out where the forums stood on the issue of the UN's obviously left-winged agenda.

I don't want them to run my country.

They don't you idiot, you still remain in complete control of your country, being a member simply gives you the right to vote on law up for voting, and if it passes by a majority then it becomes 100% enforced by game mechanics not the U.N.

As before, learn the rules.

Well, I remember vaguely (must be all that pot :wink: )reading in the summary of the UN, some bussiness about if ur part of the un, and the UN makes a decision on something, then u have to abide by the decision... the author of the faq went on to say something like, "you cant take the laws you like and ignore the rest, like realy countrys" and thus indicates, that it does affect the overall management of your nation.
If you agree lets form an allience.

An alliance to do what exactly, smoke even greater quantities of pot? Cause thats what it looks like has been going on here, then again, maybe your going to move on to heavier drugs like your little friends next post?

yes, on the sign up thing for the countrys, my country is listed for the advocacy for legalization of marijuana. but i am pretty sure you wern't trying to raise a debate over that, so ill move on.
The collonisian government welcome the advocacy of the destruction and nuclear suicide bombings of the United nations

After blinking repreatedly and trying to translate your manic raving, I worked out your proposing to "nuke" the U.N. with suicide attacks, thats great, your obviously no threat, if you think a suicide bombers going to walk into a non-existent building with a "nuke" strapped to his back, you've clearly no idea about nuclear weapons, logistics, security, or even foe that matter the effects of a nuclear weapon and its potent range.

*laughs manically* u may think you know that we're not going to nuke the un, but look at what happened on 9-11... people died for the cause of killing a wretched country (dont get offended, im role-playin) who has been corrupting their country for a long long time. the UN is based on the same principals as the US, (freedoms and basically the will to control other countrys, so, it needs to be figuratively "nuked"
And all who submit to their socialist views.

Well hello, I'm a democratic capitalist paradise with a liberal mind-set, does that make me an evil soccialist lap dog? Your a ninny, stop using terms you don't know the meaning of, it costs me time in shooting your half-assed posts down.
a democratic capitalist... ok... with a liberal mid set... thats like, an oxy moron... how the hell can u be a capitalist and a liberal at the same time?!
you cant.
We hereby welcome the alliance with the politalish, and reaferm our values of economic and political freedoms.

In one sweeping line, you've demonstrated your zero level of knowledge on the U.N. and proven why I could justifiablycall you an ignorant noise maker and thus end my argument, but that would be unfair, many people reading this would wish you suffer further, and so for my fans the show must go on!

The U.N. is more then capable of increasing economic freedoms as well as political ones, a fact which previous passed proposals have proved. You can go read them yourself and work it out by your lone-some, if I try to inform you, you'll just block it out most likely...

See, your eyes are glazed completely now, the drugs your apparently on must be bringing you down...

In conclusion, test your nuke before you detonate it, I suggest it be just the two you, and the nuke, in an empty stretch of land in the middle of no-where, and detonate while making sure your standing right next to it.

It won't help you, but it sure will make thing quieter around here.

- The Rep of Komokom.

And consider yourself to be officially frying-panned.
Sophista
18-03-2004, 05:54
Ugh. All this stupidity is staining the carpets. Someone should really tell security to keep those hooligan outsiders at the gates and let them bitch from a safe distance. It is not our responsibility to explain how the political compass works, and if you hate the way the UN is "so freakin' liberal" then get a whole bunch of your right wing cronies to join up and start the proposal work. Imagine the fun if you could pass a "conservative" resolution, eh? Seriously. Grow up and work for change.

Sincerely yours,
Daniel M. Hillaker
Minister of Foreign Affairs
18-03-2004, 06:28
Politalish's post was pointless and stupid. However, it was brief.
Collonisia is ignorant and verbose, making his posts far worse. It's amazing the kind of people that manage to run a country.
Enn
18-03-2004, 09:23
Umm... for a start, how are you going to destroy the UN? Some of the largest nations in the world are under the UN's auspices, and I doubt they would even notice your attempts to smite them.
Evil-Catzegovina
18-03-2004, 09:30
Are you still absolutely sure you want Habeus Corpus to protect everyone? :wink:
Enn
18-03-2004, 09:31
Exceptions could be made... in very specific circumstances... :wink:
18-03-2004, 10:02
*laughs uproariously at Collonisia's political philosophy as expressed in his last post on this thread*

Can't be a capitalist and a liberal at the same time? Oh stop it, you're killing me. Here's a copy of Smith's Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Take it now before I hit you with it.
Komokom
18-03-2004, 10:08
in all honesty, distinguished representitive of Komokom, i do not believe that neither the Politalish kind, nor I, were trying to sway anybody to our views. we were merely trying to find out where the forums stood on the issue of the UN's obviously left-winged agenda.

Oh, I realise that now, other-wise, had you been trying to sway us, you would rather have tried to reason with us in a civilised fashion, rather then threaten with agressive prose and ideas, oh, and make a right fool of yourself before the major voices here, some of whom I see have already posted their distress at the extremist, and certainly ignorant, child-like views of you and your "ally".

Oh, and please drop the "left-wing agenda" crap, its non-existent and is an argument always brought up by people with no idea how the place works and have no real interest in finding out, judging by past times its been used...

Well, I remember vaguely (must be all that pot :wink: )reading in the summary of the UN, some bussiness about if ur part of the un, and the UN makes a decision on something, then u have to abide by the decision... the author of the faq went on to say something like, "you cant take the laws you like and ignore the rest, like realy countrys" and thus indicates, that it does affect the overall management of your nation.

Yes.. but, argh, that is due to the game mechanics, the hard wired program bit that runs this place, including the U.N. but also how exactly everything happens to work and is responed too, and it was an executive decision by the programmer to make it 100% law enforcement for the U.N. not the U.N. an its members themselves,

And no, it can't be changed, and requesting it to be these days, especially in a proposal can get you bee-hind kicked by the moderation staff.

And I revoke my comment on the pot, I'd rather suggest heroin, if I think heroin, it partially calms me cause then theres always the chance your "fix" may get "cut" real bad... Oh no, I went and said it out loud.

Which I am glad I did, especially when reading the bit after you "manic laugh" below...

yes, on the sign up thing for the countrys, my country is listed for the advocacy for legalization of marijuana. but i am pretty sure you wern't trying to raise a debate over that, so ill move on.

Ha ha ha, yeah, like you'll ever legalise soft and hard drugs, sorry, but I think most people are thankfully "conservative" enough to stop that.

*laughs manically* u may think you know that we're not going to nuke the un, but look at what happened on 9-11... people died for the cause of killing a wretched country (dont get offended, im role-playin) who has been corrupting their country for a long long time. the UN is based on the same principals as the US, (freedoms and basically the will to control other countrys, so, it needs to be figuratively.

Excuse me, hide behind role play if you wish, but quite frankly I am pretty sure were we in "real life" right now the lynch mob would have you swinging from the old hang'in tree, you sick ****-****, and I'm going on record with that statement...

Quite frankly if your going to offend any-body who respects innocent life, then you can darn'd well expect it back. How dare you use the massive loss of life to justify your childish little games, if you've any respect for others, which I now clearly doubt, you'll apologise for that very quickly.

By the by, I'm just going to ignore your inability to comprehend world politics, oh, yes, and the chronological chain of events...

a democratic capitalist... ok... with a liberal mid set... thats like, an oxy moron... how the hell can u be a capitalist and a liberal at the same time?!
you cant.

No, in your case though, I wish it were the cirmcumstances of an fatally oxy-gen-deprived-moron...

Capitalism has to do more with economic way of life you ninny, yes it factors in with politics, but if you say liberal, your usually looking to the opposite or lesser degree of the idea of conservatisim, being liberal is to do with views on morality, opinions, general way of life, while capitalism is to do with socio-economic structure. I could go on and explain more clearly, but I am so offended by your post that quite frankly, I could not give a rats ass if you learn anything.

- The Rep of Komokom.

[And consider yourself to be officially frying-panned and billiard cue'd too.
Hirota
18-03-2004, 10:10
in all honesty, distinguished representitive of Komokom, i do not believe that neither the Politalish kind, nor I, were trying to sway anybody to our views. we were merely trying to find out where the forums stood on the issue of the UN's obviously left-winged agenda.

Don't put words in Politalish's mouths. They were simply being idiots, and you can't change that by pretending they were trying to make some intelligent points.

Well, I remember vaguely (must be all that pot :wink: )reading in the summary of the UN, some bussiness about if ur part of the un, and the UN makes a decision on something, then u have to abide by the decision... the author of the faq went on to say something like, "you cant take the laws you like and ignore the rest, like realy countrys" and thus indicates, that it does affect the overall management of your nation.
Well don't join the UN then! Oh and do try and learn how to spell....you might make intelligent points, but it's undermined when you start writing "bussiness" and "u".

*laughs manically* u may think you know that we're not going to nuke the un, but look at what happened on 9-11...
:roll: gosh another person using fictional examples from a fictional United States to explain fictional arguements. :roll:

(dont get offended, im role-playin)

OOC: not very well, you keep refering to non-NationStates examples.

a democratic capitalist... ok... with a liberal mid set... thats like, an oxy moron... how the hell can u be a capitalist and a liberal at the same time?!
you cant.

Yes you can. Well, to an extent. You can always be a moderate on all those issues..
Xhadam
18-03-2004, 10:22
For simple amusement value, Xha'dam requests that Collonisia post and explain the problems with a functioning Socialist system. Collonisia only please.
Komokom
18-03-2004, 11:40
I second Xhadam's request, and re-state my request that Collonisia apologise for the pre-stated reason in my last post.

- The Rep of Komokom.
Enn
18-03-2004, 11:49
And now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the amazing Collonisian disappearing act!
18-03-2004, 19:39
I AGREE! The UN is kinda pointless, most of the proposals could just as easily be issues that each country can resolve in the way they see fit. The only reason I am even in the UN is for secret reasons . . .
18-03-2004, 19:40
I AGREE! The UN is kinda pointless, most of the proposals could just as easily be issues that each country can resolve in the way they see fit. The only reason I am even in the UN is for secret reasons . . .
Komokom
20-03-2004, 06:43
And now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the amazing Collonisian disappearing act!

Hey, yeah... Hey, I call we change in their not being here, Collonisians name to Colon-brain. Any one to second?

:) Yes, I am evil, but at least I am occasionally a funny b'tard.

Hey, I just realised the word "fuck" is censored here.... < see !

Fancy that, now I have to change my favourite real life term "fuck-tard" into by secondary favourite real world term, "fock-tard"

Where was I, oh, yeah,

- The Rep of Komokom.