NationStates Jolt Archive


Draft - rewording of the Trafficking proposal

Rehochipe
19-02-2004, 23:38
The proposal 'Ban Trafficking', submitted by The Free Land of North Koster and due to expire within a couple of days, raises an important issue and one worthy of being addressed by the UN. However, several things struck me as being problematic about it:
a) Although ostensibly only addressing trafficking for the purposes of sexual prostitution, the proposition's definition of 'exploitation' was sufficiently broad to cover slavery, an issue already covered by extant UN policy.
b) Only the trafficking of women was mentioned, with no specific acknowledgement of the closely related issue of the trafficking of underage children.
c) The proposal commits member-states only to legislation, which would be hollow without pledges of cooperative action.
d) The definition of 'trafficking in persons' made no distinction between domestic and international trafficking; it is not the UN's role to legislate against the former.
e) The resolution contained grammatical errors and was not phrased in the standard form of a UN resolution.

Here's the original proposal:
Description: It is becoming increasingly common that women are sold as sex slaves on the black market. Often the women, who come from less fortunate countries, are lured to more developed countries by people who promise them a better life there. Instead, upon the women's arrival to their new countries, these people deprive the them of their freedom and sell them as sex slaves. This is known as trafficking.

'Trafficking in persons' shall mean the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation. Exploitation shall include, at a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labour or services, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude or the removal of organs.

I hereby urge the UN to take action. Decriminalize the women in prostitution but criminalize both the men who illegally buy women and children against their will, and anyone who promotes sexual exploitation, particularly pimps, procurers and traffickers.


Nevertheless, the issue deserves to be dealt with, so here's a first draft of a reworked version. I'm still somewhat shaky on how the definition of 'involvement' should be worded; any input?

The General Assembly,

Recognising that the illegal trafficking of women or children across international borders for the purposes of prostitution (hereafter referred to as 'sex trafficking') constitutes a growing human rights issue,

Acknowledging that it is usually the case that those trafficked act under compulsion and are moreover initially unaware of the nature of the trafficking,

Aware that such activity is commonly linked to, supports and is supported by other branches of organised crime,

Noting that sex trafficking networks operate internationally and are problematic to combat effectively at national level,

Convinced that this activity constitutes an issue of a fundamentally more serious nature than that of domestic prostitution,


Affirms that trafficked prostitutes are not criminals but victims of crime,

Declares that involvement at any level of the sex trafficking chain shall henceforth be considered an international crime subject to all conditions of trial and punishment in the country of the victim's origin, or at international level in the case of multiple nationalities,

Instates sex trafficking as an offence liable to stronger prosecution than other forms of trafficking and illegal immigration,

Pledges that its police, border control, security and intelligence forces shall cooperate fully, exchanging information and personnel where appropriate, over matters involving or suspected to involve human trafficking,

Recommends that such states as have legalised prostitution pass statutes and implement such procedures as are necessary to enforce them, restricting prostitution solely to those who have legitimate citizenship.


Further amendments? Rewordings? Definitions?
Rehochipe
22-02-2004, 14:01
A couple of additional clauses, though the definition-of-trafficking clause is still giving me trouble; input appreciated.

Acknowledging that we are committed by extant UN legislation to prosecute slavery in all its forms,

Declare that no UN country shall harbour, shield from prosecution or grant asylum to any individual wanted for trafficking crimes in another UN country; but grant their right, if they dispute the legitimacy of the claim, to hold trial on their own soil under the other nation's laws, or to request the international court to ascertain there is sufficient reason.

Elsepeth R. Nibbling
Ministry of Being Nice
The Black New World
22-02-2004, 16:43
Only the trafficking of women was mentioned, with no specific acknowledgement of the closely related issue of the trafficking of underage children.

We feel that men should also be protected.

Desdemona,
UN representative,
The Back New World
22-02-2004, 16:49
A proposal that merits cosideration at any rate. Slaver of any sort is considered abominable by my nation. Whether it be sexual bondage of women, children, or men, or the broader condition of the enslavement of a nation, race, or ethnic group.

As written, this proposal needs to die.

I think it should be resurrected at some point in time, and seriously reworked by a group of nations (introduce the concept of commitees, and study groups, hint, hint, hint)
Rehochipe
22-02-2004, 18:29
Black New World: yes, the wording of any definition would have to be inclusive of all genders and ages, but recognise that the overwhelming majority of victims are young women and children.

A large reason I (stole and) rewrote this proposal was that slavery's already legislated against by the UN, and the need here is to identify and introduce specific measures against a particuarly troubling subset thereof.

(And I've just realised, a past resolution legalises prostitution in all UN states. Must reword to account for that).

As written, this proposal needs to die.
Any chance of an explanation why?
22-02-2004, 21:15
Rehochipe asks "Any chance of an explanation why?"

In my own post, I started a sentence with "Whether it be sexual bondage of women, children, or men,"

From one of your own posts, "b) Only the trafficking of women was mentioned, with no specific acknowledgement of the closely related issue of the trafficking of underage children. "

I think however, that I owe an apology, as I overstated my position. This IS a workshop, basically, and you are asking for input. I think that I have allowed my determination to oppose ill thought our proposals get in the way, and I failed to recognize exactly what you are doing here.

I wonder about something. Being that there IS a mandate against slavery already, it seems to me that what you are really trying to do to redefine slavery. The buying and selling of human bodies for sexual gratification definitely should be considered as slavery.

Perhaps, with some further work, you might propose your work as an addendum to existing mandates against slavery?

Forgive me if I'm still not entirely in tune with you, I'm kind of thinking out loud. But, it seems to me that a body of laws should be kept as simple as possible, neatly arranged, with similar laws found under a common heading. As I see things right now, you are attempting to clarify slavery laws, and to include sexual exploitation with the more common concepts of slavery.

Is there a mechanism, whereby one could make an addendum to an existing law? I gotta look at the idea.
Rehochipe
23-02-2004, 18:13
Yeah - you could very easily look at this proposition as a particuarly strong special-case implementation of the slavery ruling (which was really worded more of a statement of intent than a commitment to fight crime). The proposition could already be read as this, but it's not explicit. I'll reword to reflect this, hack out an introductory paragraph, and resubmit.

As far as I know, there's no mechanism for addendums - follow-up resolutions clarifying specific points would seem to be the way forward.