NationStates Jolt Archive


Save the Forests of the World

Toasted Almond Bars
18-02-2004, 21:33
Save the forests of the World
A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.


Category: Environmental
Industry Affected: Woodchipping
Proposed by: The Lords of the Isles


Description: For years the forest of numerous nations have been abused and destroyed for profit. In many nations, this is reaching critical leavels, almost to the point where all the forests are gone. If we destroy the forests now, they're gone. Forever. My reasons for this proposal are twofold:

1. Enviromental Concerns
The destruction of the rainforest has a major destructive effect on the enviroment. Countless spieces of plant and animal will be destroyed if deforestation continues at the rate that it is currently. These animals would be dead, and thier would be no way of resurecting them, short of cloning, which rases an entirly diferent moral issue. The simple fact is that the destruction of rainforest is simply pointless destruction as thier is no way to make the forests renewable without seriously cutting the money that they make, which is the reason for thier destruction anyway! The mindless destroying of a valuable national resorce will, in the long run, achieve nothing.

2. Thoughts of the future
By destroying the forests today, there is no way that they will produce money in the future, either through turism or logging. People don't recognise that, while forests make more money more quickly when felled on the mass scale, in the long run, monetarily the same amount of money could be produced by carefully felling a section of forest, then helping it regrow. This way, the woods produced would be more valuable on the international market due to the decreased availability of the timber. Over a longer amount of time, the money produced would, in fact, outstrip the money made by the wanton destruction. The forest would, with help, renew its self and go on making money. As and added bonus, turism would increase.

Solution
While decreasing the would chipping industry would, in the short term, over hundreds of years the over all efects on the enviroment would realy save the world from the rampart destruction of forest that it has fallen into a cycle of.

Does the current proposal actually do anything? It mentions excessive woodcutting as harmful towards the environment(which is true) but does it propose a fix?
19-02-2004, 00:14
I would imagine that the alternative is less wood-cutting, and more new trees being planted.
The Bruce
19-02-2004, 01:39
Greetings to All and Sundry,

The Green and Pleasant Dominion of the Bruce is as environmentally friendly as the next Nation State, but in this case we must urge everyone to vote against this ridiculous Resolution. There has been a Resolution already dealing with putting the brakes on the Woodchipping Industry: 'Replanting Trees'. The difference between the current Resolution and the old one is how to go about the perceived deforestation. The previously passed one requires that anyone responsible for falling a tree plant new trees in its place. The new Resolution is much longer, has terrible spelling that causes its punch line at the end to be very ambiguous, and appears to call on the decrease of logging over the next several centuries in all UN Nations. Now it was bad enough to have two trees planted for every one felled, without any guidelines, but to put the brakes on the logging industry for 100’s of Years to come in all UN Nations, with no plan, is shear lunacy.

Grande Elector Bruce

The Green and Pleasant Dominion of The Bruce
19-02-2004, 06:29
This resolution must fail! A foreign power has no right to dictate how Texan Supremecy deals with it's economy. Woodchipping is our proud nation's #4 income revenue, and if passes, this resolution would cripple that enterprise, resulting in disaster for our economy and in turn would destroy jobs to compensate for the loss in revenue.

In the name of liberty and free enterprise, I call upon all the free nations of the world to encourage their delegates to vote nay on this resolution.
19-02-2004, 09:16
This proposal just sounds like someone airing their beliefs, rather than forwarding a fact-based argument.

A pointless, empty bill that really needs to be dismissed rather than defeated.
19-02-2004, 09:30
Typical "save the trees and damn humanity".... I'm surprised at the number of nations voting for this "feel good" and then have your nation starve later attitude. just our $0.02

Church Authority of the Theocracy of Psychotropics
19-02-2004, 09:51
This resolution must fail! A foreign power has no right to dictate how Texan Supremecy deals with it's economy. Woodchipping is our proud nation's #4 income revenue, and if passes, this resolution would cripple that enterprise, resulting in disaster for our economy and in turn would destroy jobs to compensate for the loss in revenue.

In the name of liberty and free enterprise, I call upon all the free nations of the world to encourage their delegates to vote nay on this resolution.

If you didn't want other people making rules for you, why oh why did you join the UN?
19-02-2004, 09:53
lol dwarfs will live by rules if fair
19-02-2004, 09:53
This resolution must fail! A foreign power has no right to dictate how Texan Supremecy deals with it's economy. Woodchipping is our proud nation's #4 income revenue, and if passes, this resolution would cripple that enterprise, resulting in disaster for our economy and in turn would destroy jobs to compensate for the loss in revenue.

In the name of liberty and free enterprise, I call upon all the free nations of the world to encourage their delegates to vote nay on this resolution.

If you didn't want other people making rules for you, why oh why did you join the UN?

The Texan Supremecy wanted to dictate yours ;)

Bishop Leary, Minister of Chemestry for the Theocracy of Psychotropics
19-02-2004, 15:43
See the thread above on this subject - save the...what the hell

By the way, as seems to be the trend with these type of proposals, this one is set to pass by a majority of 2-1 and there's not a thing the people who actually PLAY this game can do about it. NOT EVEN THE MODS!
Lossenbar
19-02-2004, 16:10
Hey, I'm all about protecting the rainforests, conserving our natural resources, and renewing them as much as possible. But I find it hard to take seriously a resolution that's so poorly written. Bad structure is one thing, but the spelling is inexcusable.

I'm voting against it with the presumption that someone can created a better proposal to protect the world's environment.

Of course, since apparently as a member of the UN there's now legal prostitution in Lossenbar, I guess truly anything can happen.