Rehochipe
18-02-2004, 17:28
This may be a naive question, but...
Having gone over the list of past suscessful UN proposals, and compared this to the extant policies of various member-states, I'm drawn to wonder whether the wording of the FAQ entry ('You can't just obey the resolutions you like and ignore the rest, like real nations do') actually has any genuine import. The issue of the last resolution's wording highlighted that a substantial proportion of UN members simply aren't aware of, or take no notice of, past resolutions, and that the UN is scarily unable to enforce them. But there are other examples - many member states appear to be extensively deforested and polluted despite explicit and strong environmental regulations in past resolutions.
As a new UN member and complete n00b, I can see little evidence that this is more than a ego-boosting device for delegates. Am I missing something critical, or should I withdraw membership?
Having gone over the list of past suscessful UN proposals, and compared this to the extant policies of various member-states, I'm drawn to wonder whether the wording of the FAQ entry ('You can't just obey the resolutions you like and ignore the rest, like real nations do') actually has any genuine import. The issue of the last resolution's wording highlighted that a substantial proportion of UN members simply aren't aware of, or take no notice of, past resolutions, and that the UN is scarily unable to enforce them. But there are other examples - many member states appear to be extensively deforested and polluted despite explicit and strong environmental regulations in past resolutions.
As a new UN member and complete n00b, I can see little evidence that this is more than a ego-boosting device for delegates. Am I missing something critical, or should I withdraw membership?