NationStates Jolt Archive

I'm sorry but that was just way way too simplistic, this resolution completely oversimplifies many many issues into one very very general and vague one. The kind of environmental effects, the possible solutions to the current situation, the perpetrators of the logging and deforestations around the world, the kinds of forests and their specific needs, possible comprimises, and even the very point of the "Proposal" are scarecely or never mentioned at all.
The biggest problem I have with this resolution is the absence of a resolution or proposal it doesn't really seem to have any point behind this issue the best i can manage to induce amongst the typos, mispelled words and sweeping generalisations is that the 'would' chipping industry should be 'reduced' I guess maybe the intention was to say that regulations should be placed on the logging of deforestation.

If this is the case however it simply cannot pass without drastic rephrasing of the issue definition or guidlines as to what 'reducing' would mean and some mention of specifics particularly regions or nations where deforestation is chronic so that the best course of action can be taken. Because of the many many details behind destruction of forests that are specific to places and culture a unilateral resolution for all nations would probably not be suitable because some places may need extremely severe regulation in order to save the forests of the place from destruction.

So basically say 'no'

By the way I accidentally posted this from the wrong nation into the wrong topic i meant to post it into an already exisiting topic not create my own and I didn't know I was still using my other nation so don't bother looking at my nation's stats cos they don't really reflect any of my true nations opinion's.

Unfortunately, sheep don't read the forums. More unfortunate, they vote yes on whatever is up for vote. It's going to pass. The time for this criticism was before it was approved by the delegate council.