NationStates Jolt Archive

Bunch of sex obsessed freaks for a group that's supposed to be about international stability and security.

Last proposal to get through:
"Legalize prostitution"

Current proposals striving for quorum:
"National Condom Law"
"Breast Enhancement"
"Not just choice, safe choice [abortion]"
"Legalize Abortion"

Current threads in the UN section of the forum:
"sodomy laws"
"legalized prostitution?"
"The Sexual Services Act - A proposal"
"Should Incest be Legal Proposal"
"Masturbation Fridays"

Just... wow. For a group that should have absolutely nothing at all to do with my citizens penises, vaginas, anuses and breasts, there seems to be one heck of a lot of interest going on.

My citizens are somewhat uncomfortable with the UN's obsession with said body parts and their use. They are questioning why it is that the UN seems to consist largely of sex deprived pubescent teenagers. They're sure it's not, but it does seem to seem that way.

Is there a good reason? When did penises, vaginas, anuses and breasts become matters of international security and stability?

Hmm, while I sympathize with the essence of what you express, I do not feel that 'sodomy' and particularly abortion are issues connected with sex obsession. That's rather insensitive of you, to say the least.

Maya Toitovna
Speaker for Home Affairs

Hmm, while I sympathize with the essence of what you express, I do not feel that 'sodomy' and particularly abortion are issues connected with sex obsession. That's rather insensitive of you, to say the least.

Maya Toitovna
Speaker for Home Affairs

Last time I checked, sodomy meant inserting a penis into someones anus. Where I come from, that constitues a sex act. As such, I fail to see how the UN's jurisdiction contains sodomy.

My mummy told me that babies happen when a man inserts his penis into a womans vagina. As such, abortion has a relationship to sex. Furthermore, it's not in the UN's jurisdiction.

I left out many threads that repeat. All of a sudden the UN is all about sex and that, whilst not worrying as such as I expect that from the age group, it disturbs me a tad that this is going to be the norm from now.

With all due respect to Speaker Toitovna, Illaria points out that these issues should be "Home Affairs" as her office demonstrates.

Illarian researchers have come to conclusions similar to Gigglealia's, but have just let it be as "the way things are"

I agree that these probably should not be UN issues. I just feel that describing people debating issues such as abortion as 'sex freaks' is wrong.

I agree that these probably should not be UN issues. I just feel that describing people debating issues such as abortion as 'sex freaks' is wrong.

Oh sure, some of the people involved aren't sex freaks at all. The UN as a body sure is though. I'm only in it to give me something to do in the game besides the same issues again and again.

besides, better political diversity exists out here than say... some partisan site (though there's a decidedly liberal slant to this UN)

I agree that this UN has become entirely too involved in Sex...
Incest? Someone wants to do their 1st cousin or worse parents?
Maybe they aren't Sex Freaks but
1) freak- a stranghe, abnormal, or unusal person or thing.
An ardent enthusiast
2) sex- sexual activity or behavior.(sexual intercourse, etc)
Now Sex freaks are ardent enthusiast of sex.
Gasp, that accurately describes these people!

It's the Parliament of Whores!