Ban Breast Enhancement
Capitalist Bao States
30-01-2004, 20:37
http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/01308/page=UN_proposal/start=95
My future region delegate has proposed a resolution banning breast enhancement. While it's a government regulation and therefore anti-capitalist, it will send a message to the socialist nations of the world. We conservatives *have* to take back the UN, even if we don't necessarily agree with some of the resolutions. We have to ban together to get rid of socialists.
The end does not justify the means...
Breasts are overated anyway. Bans are bad though. They may shrink the UN.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pìg!ome, g||xòfùme.-I am a human, not a tool.
No Mods, No Masters!
http://www.sulucas.com/images/steatopygia.jpg
I'm male. Note the pic of attractive women.
Greenspoint
31-01-2004, 05:19
The Rogue Nation of Greenspoint fails to see how banning breast enhancements will send any kind of political message to socialists or allow any one political group to ..take back the UN, even if we don't necessarily agree with some of the resolutions.
We find this proposal to be a waste of this august body's time.
James Moehlman
Asst. Manager ico U.N. Affairs
I'm not going to bother with a real response, so:
I liek big Bewbs.
If the boobs don't hurt the babes let 'em do it
While the leaderhead of the Prussian States certainly prefers natural breasts over silicone airbags, the government feels that everyone has the right to do whatever they please with their body. Though I certainly don't see how breasts implants are a socialist idea.
Kryozerkia
31-01-2004, 06:30
Once again, the issue is a domestic rather than an international issue. It's exactly ignorant things like these that cause many to resign from the UN.
Elizaldeland
31-01-2004, 06:59
I don't see how breast enhancement could become an international issue. rather, it should be addressed at the local level.
Catholic Europe
31-01-2004, 10:07
Catholic Europe has no problem with breast enhancement. We don't se why it should be banned, afterall it's up to the individual and as long as they don't go mad then it is fine. :D
Emperor Matthuis
31-01-2004, 11:46
Breast Enhancement
A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.
Category: Moral Decency Strength: Strong Proposed by: The European States
Description: Breast enhancement is polluting the minds of young women who desire to be more physically attractive! BAN IT!
Approvals: 1 (Quantum Group)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 145 more approvals)
Voting Ends: Mon Feb 2 2004
No i don't support it, :wink:
I hate to say it, but this has to be the most bullshit proposal I have ever seen.
oooo, the evil socialists are coming to get you. MOO.
Collaboration
31-01-2004, 16:42
Aalthough we prefer the natural look, matters of this sort are best left to local control.
It is not an international issue.
Capitalist Bao States
31-01-2004, 17:40
The Socialists are killing the family by promiting promiscuity and the such. Banning breast enhancements would take back our culture by taking the emphasis on sex out.
Elvandair
31-01-2004, 17:43
Breasts are fun! Why ban them? There are so many flat-chested girls who need them in order to get boyfriends. A girl with out breasts is like a dairy cow without milk.
Big boobs are great. They dont hurt anyone.
Our Kingdom does not outlaw breast augmentations, but we've never had a legal operation performed before.
Perhaps it is because we raise our children with the mindset that artificially changing ones body for the purpose of vanity is wrong.
Corriene
31-01-2004, 20:43
This isn't much different than getting a body tattoo or piercings. It's a freedom of choice, although something should be done about society's image of women that is pushing them to get this kind of operation done.
I say that huge butts are better. A huge butt combined with a relatively small waist is great.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pìg!ome, g||xòfùme.-I am a human, not a tool.
No Mods, No Masters!
http://www.sulucas.com/images/steatopygia.jpg
I'm male. Note the pic of attractive women.
Corriene
31-01-2004, 22:22
I say that huge butts are better. A huge butt combined with a relatively small waist is great.
And how do comments like this one relate to the topic? This comment doesn't even mention the word "breast", implied or not. At issue is this proposal, not your personal taste.
I suppose you're right. It was rather pointless.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pìg!ome, g||xòfùme.-I am a human, not a tool.
No Mods, No Masters!
http://www.sulucas.com/images/steatopygia.jpg
I'm male. Note the pic of attractive women.
Wait, which culture's family values do implant impose upon?
Should we stop being the UN and start being the United Cultures?
If so, that sounds like a Socialist movement to me, trying to blend them all into one big social culture....
this has got to be the most stupid proposal i have seen yet. this is a waste of my and everyone elses time. why would you ban something so mincule and non-important. if the chick want to do it then let her. the reason mst women do it is to increase her sed-esteam (but thats just my opinion.)
:D
Grand Atoll
01-02-2004, 00:33
I suppose you're right. It was rather pointless.
Not unlike this proposal. :wink:
Corriene
01-02-2004, 00:34
I suppose you're right. It was rather pointless.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pìg!ome, g||xòfùme.-I am a human, not a tool.
No Mods, No Masters!
http://www.sulucas.com/images/steatopygia.jpg
I'm male. Note the pic of attractive women.
Pointless, perhaps, but not entirely lacking in amusement.