NationStates Jolt Archive


Ok I've had enough of of this disarmament crap.

Alienware
29-01-2004, 05:14
Ok people just stop. It isn't ever going to happen unless the UN is overrun with peace-loving hippes. So by putting a proposal in about global disarmament and world peace and all that other crap that will NEVER HAPPEN is a waste of your time, my time, and everyone else's time. And before you people tell me to just not even read it, and to skip over it, I already do that. It's just completely idiotic to propose something that has no hopes of being passed. So here's my opinion, JUST STOP!!!!
Ikkitousen
29-01-2004, 05:48
Yes, I agree that Global disarmament will never happen. Even if this does start to happen, I will never relenquish (sp?) any of my weapons to something my nation is not a part of. If anyone or any organization tries to disarm my nation, I will respond with military force.
Colodia
29-01-2004, 10:31
Disarment is idiotic. Even with the MINIMAL chance that the world is 100% disarmed, there are still some factors to consider

1. civilians creating weapons themselves (home-made bombs, fireworks, etc.)
2. Aliens invading us (it COULD happen)
3. one nation hiding it's weapons for the global disarment to take over the world
29-01-2004, 10:43
Disarment is idiotic. Even with the MINIMAL chance that the world is 100% disarmed, there are still some factors to consider

1. civilians creating weapons themselves (home-made bombs, fireworks, etc.)
2. Aliens invading us (it COULD happen)
3. one nation hiding it's weapons for the global disarment to take over the world

Hahaha. All three can happen anyway. So what's the big difference?
Naleth
29-01-2004, 11:00
I'd just like to point out that they are getting closer to reaching quorom. And I haven't even been endorsing them. (hint: I took it as a sign that I still have a far to powerful military when I didn't quite get below 105,000 on the last Military per capita ranking)
Gigglealia
29-01-2004, 12:06
Even peace loving Gigglealia, with one of the worlds smallest standing armed forces, laughs at the ridiculousness of the lame proposals.

We will not only continue to maintain our army and associated technology, we will not enter into any discussion or debate of further reduction until the time that the UN demonstrates it's a coherent, cohesive body not populated by idiots.
29-01-2004, 12:49
Everyone should have equally huge armies.

M.A.D. is the way forward.
29-01-2004, 14:16
No, the most powerful should have the biggest armies. That way the world is led by the strong, not by the weak. Disarmament is the most retarding state of affairs for all involved, and will stop developmental history dead in its tracks.
29-01-2004, 14:21
Although disarmament is not practically possible, the theory behind them is respectable. We should keep in mind that having weapons increases the creation of weapons, so we should keep weapons to the minimum. War is fun, of course, but we should have peace as much as possible.
Alienware
29-01-2004, 16:43
Yes, I agree that Global disarmament will never happen. Even if this does start to happen, I will never relenquish (sp?) any of my weapons to something my nation is not a part of. If anyone or any organization tries to disarm my nation, I will respond with military force.

Yes, that is what we need to do. Just completely overwhelm them with the military forces of of nations.