NationStates Jolt Archive


Animal Sanctuary Proposal: A Quick End

27-01-2004, 06:05
The proposal for a 50 acre lot of land set aside for your national animal, will only put it on a quick road to death. Please note that in accepting this proposal you will likely end up killing it. The reason for this being, due to the small area you are providing it, much incest will take place within the species.

Due to the incest, it would take only one disease to wipe out the enitre species. Rethink adding your endorsement to this proposal.

-peace, love & unity-
Frisbeeteria
27-01-2004, 06:15
Frisbeeteria maintains vast aquatic farms to keep our populus fed with the delicious Shrimp Platter. 50 acres would do little to aid in the preservation of our national animal. Combine that with the fact that one does not normally classify the inhabitants of the marine or avian world in acreage, and this proposal limits itself far too quickly.

We oppose this on vagueness and general principle. Ummm, would the delegate from Trinsinc care for some horseradish sauce?
Collaboration
27-01-2004, 16:23
We agree, the acreage proposal is too generic to fit all species, and much too small for many.

what would you say to an international sanctuary? We could purchase a sizeable island from one of the Pacific regions, say, and introduce all our national animals there, under the supervision of an international scientific team.