Drangonsile
22-01-2004, 00:05
First off the resolution breaks resolution, 245A Proper Grammar.
“or die with a little dignity left intact”
Who says that is dignified? Not me or the other 204/250 polled said it wasn’t.
Loophole:
Genocidal Dictator *coughhitlercough* reads:
In the case of a freak situation in which a person has no serious illness or is over a certain age, if the person cannot make the decision themselves it would be made by those closest to them on the basis of professional medical advice. Also if the patient is in a coma, 5-10 years should be waited until those closest to them make a decision.
Genocidal Dictator *coughhitlercough* says:
It never says the age so the age is 2 weeks, the (group Genocidal Dictator *coughhitlercough* wants to get ride of) can’t decide to die so I decide for them with my highly racist doctors support.
The act also must be carried out in the most painless way possible.
Painless death?? You can’t inject them that hurts, gas hurts, the only way is asleep but they would wake up.
Why should carers use up time on those certain to die, when this time could be spent with those with a chance of life?
Everyone dies so we shall kill everyone; no one has a chance of life. (Is carers a word?)
And for those using religion as a barrier
Resolution, Religious Tolerance allows religion to be a barrier.
Since the Resolution has a sob story I have one to (Shorter and less time wasting)
A man of 63 lay in bed with an expected life of only a few days. He begged to be allowed to be killed, but was denied. A few days he got better, he then lived to be 83 where he died in bed.
There for I propose any choices that have an issue or a sensitive, Euthanasia, abortion, religion (beyond freedom of religion), and how to deal with crime be up to each nation.
Please support this. Discuse it here.
“or die with a little dignity left intact”
Who says that is dignified? Not me or the other 204/250 polled said it wasn’t.
Loophole:
Genocidal Dictator *coughhitlercough* reads:
In the case of a freak situation in which a person has no serious illness or is over a certain age, if the person cannot make the decision themselves it would be made by those closest to them on the basis of professional medical advice. Also if the patient is in a coma, 5-10 years should be waited until those closest to them make a decision.
Genocidal Dictator *coughhitlercough* says:
It never says the age so the age is 2 weeks, the (group Genocidal Dictator *coughhitlercough* wants to get ride of) can’t decide to die so I decide for them with my highly racist doctors support.
The act also must be carried out in the most painless way possible.
Painless death?? You can’t inject them that hurts, gas hurts, the only way is asleep but they would wake up.
Why should carers use up time on those certain to die, when this time could be spent with those with a chance of life?
Everyone dies so we shall kill everyone; no one has a chance of life. (Is carers a word?)
And for those using religion as a barrier
Resolution, Religious Tolerance allows religion to be a barrier.
Since the Resolution has a sob story I have one to (Shorter and less time wasting)
A man of 63 lay in bed with an expected life of only a few days. He begged to be allowed to be killed, but was denied. A few days he got better, he then lived to be 83 where he died in bed.
There for I propose any choices that have an issue or a sensitive, Euthanasia, abortion, religion (beyond freedom of religion), and how to deal with crime be up to each nation.
Please support this. Discuse it here.