NationStates Jolt Archive

Distinguished Delegates,

We, the people of Guarde would appreciate it if you would take the time to look over a proposal submitted that would enhance education the world over, and if it is to your liking, approve it to go to vote.

The proposal can be found by searching for streamline education. (I haven't worked out how to create a link to the page it's on yet)

I would be happy to answer any questions. I wish your nation and region prosperity.

Head Yamarra,
Guarde.

To make life easy (and so you don't have to go searching for it)


Streamlined education

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Guarde

Description:

Resolved, education should be provided for all free of charge, to a level beyond basic.

It is proposed that education systems be streamlined everywhere, in a way that has already been implemented (successfully) in some countries.

It is proposed that from the age of 16, facilities be made available for students to study a more specialised set of subjects, pertaining to and directly related to the career they hope to pursue in later life, whether it includes third level education, or going straight to the work force.

It is proposed that rather than a blanket examination at the termination of secondary education, a more varied program be adopted, allowing technically minded students to focus more on technical subjects for example, while not being forced to acquire language skills which will not be used. Allowing more physically/manually minded students to study in an area that appeals to them, and in which they will flourish, rather than discouraging them by forcing them to study technical subjects.

It is proposed that a general examination also remain as an option so that any who are unsure of what vocation they would like to pursue do not have to restrict themselves.


Summary of proposal:
It is proposed that we -

o Streamline the Education system
o Provide more focused education programs and examinations
o Retain some form of general examination for those who do not wish to specialise at that age.

Education after the age of 16 is usually reffered to as 'college' or 'university' in moste states, except where High School finishes at 18. As such, we feel this would be better left to the Private Sector for those states that have private sectors.

This is not a matter that needs to be brought before the UN.

Also, in light of the fact that you are the same proposer of the horribly loophole-ridden Euthanasia Legalisation Act, we reserve further judgement at this time.

----------------------------
Phineous Oakhurst
New Eriu's Delegate to the United Nations

The Rogue Nation of Greenspoint has several points to make regarding this proposal:

1) In order for citizens to be of the greatest service to society as a whole, they need to have a wide knowledge base, and not focus on one skill or trade. Specialisation is for insects, not humans.
2) In most cases, a 17 year-old has not yet decided what area, if any, they may wish to persue for their life.
3) The network of colleges and universities within our borders, and within our region, have programs in place to assist those that might not be able to pay for their continued education.
4) Being forced to provide 'free' education would bankrupt our entire university community which would devastate our economy.
5) This is not an issue the U.N. should even be addressing.

If this proposal makes it to the floor for a vote, we will oppose it.

Oscar Gonzales
Asst. Manager ico Education
Greenspoint

to be fair, I'll play 'devil's advocate' and argue against my stance.

2) In most cases, a 17 year-old has not yet decided what area, if any, they may wish to persue for their life.

this has been addressed by the proposal. It allows for a wide field of study for those uncertain.

4) Being forced to provide 'free' education would bankrupt our entire university community which would devastate our economy.

EDIT: I originally didn't notice the fact that they would be provided free of charge. I concur with this statement.

5) This is not an issue the U.N. should even be addressing
If this proposal makes it to the floor for a vote, we will oppose it..

New Eriu concurs.

------------
Phineous Oakhurst
New Eriu's Delegate to the United Nations.

Also, in light of the fact that you are the same proposer of the horribly loophole-ridden Euthanasia Legalisation Act, we reserve further judgement at this time.

I have read the points you made above and they are good. I feel however that I cannot let this one stand.

The above proposal is the first one I've ever submitted, so the Euthanasia legalisation act is nothing to do with me. Point in fact, I voted against it, probably for the same reason as you.

So basically your plan consists of two parts:

Take money from your local school district, and give it to the national government
Take money from the national government, and give it back to your local school district

It seems to be that this 'streamlining' only causes more bureaucratic waste -- as is demonstrated by the US Department of Education, which routinely spends more money per student in failing public schools whereas private schools that spend less money per student suceed very well.

Also, in light of the fact that you are the same proposer of the horribly loophole-ridden Euthanasia Legalisation Act, we reserve further judgement at this time.

The above proposal is the first one I've ever submitted, so the Euthanasia legalisation act is nothing to do with me.
Euthanasia was by Grande, not Guarde. Understandable mistake. Shake hands. Forgive and forget. :)

As a moral nation, the Republic of Ithuania vehemently opposes this despicable proposal. No one's mere existence gives him an entitlement to anything except being left alone.

Although we enforce a similar structure in our country we feel that this system would not work in all countries because they do not have enough money. Your proposal also seams to suggest that we must give people places on courses even if they are not qualified for it (for all) or if they are no spaces left if they choose to take it.

Desdemona,
UN representative,
The Back New World

:idea: When dealing with education it is the United Nations job to make sure that all of its member are able to give their citizens a free education. The United Nations has done this already and every person under the age of 18 has a free education. If you were saying that you wanted to give a free education to anyone over 18 then I would agree with you 100%. But not even going to the specific of ur plan you are trying to dictate how a nation teaches their children. It is a very thin line that you want us to cross. If the United Nation is to dictate how people should run their local school systems whats next :?: This is not something that should be brought up at the UN but at the specific nation. Why not turn this into an issue rather than a resolution :?:


Carl Toodubleu
United Nation Ambassador
Holy Empire of the Muad'Dib

That's not a bad idea. Might do that.

Catholic Europe supports this rsolution. We too believe that education should made free and available to anyone who wants to have an education (although it is compulsory in Catholic Europe).