NationStates Jolt Archive


BACK AND BETTER - United Nations Stabilization

18-01-2004, 02:42
Moderators removed the previous version of "United Nations Stabilization" because they misinterpreted it's meaning. I have since proposed a new version which leaves no room for doubt. This proposal seeks to untangle the mess that the UN has become and does not affect game mechanics in any way.

Please urge your delegate to support "United Nations Stabilization"!

Browse to the proposal list (http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/34598/page=UN_proposal) and use the search box at the bottom of the page to find Stabilization .

MammonLord
18-01-2004, 02:47
Unfortunatly, you have included a game mechanic change.

2. Endorses the creation of a mechanism in which the ten largest regions hold veto power over the passage of any resolution, for use not more than once in a ninety-day period.

For this reason, the moderators may remove your proposal again. You are likely to get a second warning. If you subit again you are likely to have your UN membership revoked.

while I am overall in favour of this legislature, unfortunatly the rules are quite stingent.

If it wasn't for this one line, it MAY have been legal, but that's up to the moderators.
18-01-2004, 02:56
Unfortunatly, you have included a game mechanic change.

2. Endorses the creation of a mechanism in which the ten largest regions hold veto power over the passage of any resolution, for use not more than once in a ninety-day period.

For this reason, the moderators may remove your proposal again. You are likely to get a second warning. If you subit again you are likely to have your UN membership revoked.

while I am overall in favour of this legislature, unfortunatly the rules are quite stingent.

If it wasn't for this one line, it MAY have been legal, but that's up to the moderators.
This line is only an endorsement of such a change. It is not a request or requirement. It only states pre-approval for such a measure should it ever come into question.
18-01-2004, 03:06
This line is only an endorsement of such a change. It is not a request or requirement. It only states pre-approval for such a measure should it ever come into question.

Pray that the moderator in charge views it as such. I am the apointed delegte of my region, though we're having some political trouble getting the UN to recognize it. (new region, new players, some players endorsed more than one person, there's a tie, we don't know what's going to happen tomorrow. All UN nations are in agreement that I should be the delegate however.)

Should these problems be resolved tomorrow and the proposal is still valid, you can expect my endorsement.
18-01-2004, 03:12
...you can expect my endorsement.
Thank you!