NationStates Jolt Archive

We made a proposal for more cooperation between UN countries on particular the military area, considering the great terroristic danger that is threatening all of us.
Please approve this proposal for all the UN members sake.

Why?

There should be more military cooperation between UN countries. When a UN country is attacked -this chance is big, because of the big terrorstic threats lately- the UN Community should feel obliged to help the associated members of our great world organization. We should sympathize with each other and help each other more often, since our goals are the same.

The UN members should help other members when they are attacked, this could be done in
different ways and this should be decided by the UN members their selves. It is suitable, proper and appropriate to do this for your fellow members.

Besides all of this the use of nuclear weapons should be forbidden in war, nuclear weapons can't be justified by any argument. Nuclear weapons could make an end to all human lives so this should never be an option, even not in war. The UN nations together should keep an eye on this.

Please think about this proposal wisely before you decide, because brotherhood in the UN is very important.

President of Equility

If you go on with this nuclear arms race, all you are going to do is
make the rubble bounce.
-- Winston Churchill

What are the ideas and opinions about this? Does nobody have one?

Is there a proposal amidst of all that vague talk of brotherhood and togetherness? I have no idea what you're proposing, so I'm surely not going to toss you my support.

Is there a proposal amidst of all that vague talk of brotherhood and togetherness? I have no idea what you're proposing, so I'm surely not going to toss you my support.

I am proposing that we should help UN countries when they are attacked and that Nuclear weapons should not be used, nor in attack nor in defence.
That's quite simple isn't it?

I mean, what's wrong with brotherhood an unity? I don't understand why people are against it in the UN, the whole idea of the UN is brotherhood, unity and cooperation, right? That's why we are in the UN.

The Rogue Nation of Greenspoint does not see any advantage to turning the U.N. into a world-wide mutual-defense pact. We cannot support this proposal.

James Moehlman
Assistant Manager in charge of U.N. Affairs
Greenspoint

Official statement from The Empire of Heru Ur:

"The Empire of Heru Ur reserves the right to defend any nation we deem similar to our own and of fit mind. We will not defend any nation(s) we deem as inferior or unworthy of the sacrifices expected of our citizens."

The Rogue Nation of Greenspoint does not see any advantage to turning the U.N. into a world-wide mutual-defense pact. We cannot support this proposal.

James Moehlman
Assistant Manager in charge of U.N. Affairs
Greenspoint

That's your opinion and you have every right on this opinion. But I think there is an advantage, namely the security of UN countries. Security means better economics and stability. So when you say I don't see any advantage in this proposal then I say that's wrong, but everyone has his own opinion of course.

But I think there is an advantage, namely the security of UN countries.

There are certain U.N. countries whose security the Rogue Nation of Greenspoint doesn't care about. There are a number that we would like to see done away with. The United Nations is NOT a fraternal organisation.

We will come to the aid of any nation within our region or any nation of like mind that is attacked and requests aid. We cannot support any proposal that would put our military forces into a conflict against our friends, on the same side as our enemies, or under a foreign commander.

Lt. Gen. Warren Rogers
Assistant Manager in charge of Defense
Greenspoint

But I think there is an advantage, namely the security of UN countries.

There are certain U.N. countries whose security the Rogue Nation of Greenspoint doesn't care about. There are a number that we would like to see done away with. The United Nations is NOT a fraternal organisation.

We will come to the aid of any nation within our region or any nation of like mind that is attacked and requests aid. We cannot support any proposal that would put our military forces into a conflict against our friends, on the same side as our enemies, or under a foreign commander.

Lt. Gen. Warren Rogers
Assistant Manager in charge of Defense
Greenspoint

The proposal doesn't say you have to help anyone, the proposal says you _can_ help the UN members that are in trouble if you like, and how you do that is up to you.

The proposal doesn't say you have to help anyone, the proposal says you _can_ help the UN members that are in trouble if you like, and how you do that is up to you.
We already can do that.

I ask again, is there a point to this?

The proposal doesn't say you have to help anyone, the proposal says you _can_ help the UN members that are in trouble if you like, and how you do that is up to you.

Then the proposal is arbitrary and meaningless. Of course anyone CAN help someone in trouble and however we want to, wether UN or not. Proposals brought before the UN should be important, mandatory legislation.

The proposal doesn't say you have to help anyone, the proposal says you _can_ help the UN members that are in trouble if you like, and how you do that is up to you.

Then the proposal is arbitrary and meaningless. Of course anyone CAN help someone in trouble and however we want to, wether UN or not. Proposals brought before the UN should be important, mandatory legislation.

Yes but the proposal will consolidate this more for UN members, and that's a good thing in my opinion. Besides that nuclear weapons will be forbidden to use according to the proposal.