NationStates Jolt Archive


IOT

31-12-2003, 17:55
IOT (illegally occupied territory) support this

'Countrys that have illegally occupied territory
of neighboring states
should face immediate UN sanctions.'
Xawadiland
31-12-2003, 18:11
Xawadiland agree.
31-12-2003, 18:22
We second that.
31-12-2003, 18:23
The nation of Raeldig backs that proposal!
31-12-2003, 18:44
thanks for the support :D
Soltak
31-12-2003, 21:53
IOT (illegally occupied territory) support this

'Countrys that have illegally occupied territory
of neighboring states
should face immediate UN sanctions.'

The Federation will not support this proposal until certain changes and elaborations have been made. What 'sanctions' are you talking about? How would the nations occupying territory illegally be sanctioned? Who will determine what is illegally occupying territory, and what is simply the reclaiming of lost lands or an act of war. Such situations should not always been subject to these 'sanctions' which you discuss.
01-01-2004, 00:53
IOT (illegally occupied territory) support this

'Countrys that have illegally occupied territory
of neighboring states
should face immediate UN sanctions.'

The Federation will not support this proposal until certain changes and elaborations have been made. What 'sanctions' are you talking about? How would the nations occupying territory illegally be sanctioned? Who will determine what is illegally occupying territory, and what is simply the reclaiming of lost lands or an act of war. Such situations should not always been subject to these 'sanctions' which you discuss.

sanction=ban on weapons sales
what is simply the reclaiming of lost lands =that land belongs to the people and should be returned
Soltak
01-01-2004, 00:59
Now that you've addressed those concerns, I only have two more:

1. What about lands occupied in war? That's often a consequence of war.

2. Who decides what lands were wrongly occupied and who should be sanctioned? A special UN commission?
01-01-2004, 02:52
yes
i agree with that
01-01-2004, 04:40
How about this proposal?

1. Followers of any religion that is known to support terrorism as a substitute for political means are to be executed, and that religion is to be exterminated.

2. Any race that is known to engage habitually in terrorism, far more than any other race, shall be exterminated.

This will not only eliminate terrorism, but break the stranglehold on the world's oil supply that is being used to fund terrorism.
01-01-2004, 06:19
How about this proposal?


2. Any race that is known to engage habitually in terrorism, far more than any other race, shall be exterminated.

This will not only eliminate terrorism, but break the stranglehold on the world's oil supply that is being used to fund terrorism.

out of curiousity what the fuck is that suppose to mean.

1. Followers of any religion that is known to support terrorism as a substitute for political means are to be executed, and that religion is to be exterminated.

you rasist basterd
so your emplying because one is muslim they should be killed.
look at what ur people have done in history first before you bad mouth others.
Komokom
01-01-2004, 11:48
Wow, give this one the award for *shortest* dumb ass proposal ever.

Do you people know ANYTHING about game mechanics? Hmmm?

Apparently not.

As its impossible to act with force to enforce it, plus not to mention the logistical head-aches.

Eh, ah well, it'll never pass in this form so no worries.

A Rep of Komokom.
Xawadiland
01-01-2004, 12:47
How about this proposal?

1. Followers of any religion that is known to support terrorism as a substitute for political means are to be executed, and that religion is to be exterminated.

2. Any race that is known to engage habitually in terrorism, far more than any other race, shall be exterminated.

This will not only eliminate terrorism, but break the stranglehold on the world's oil supply that is being used to fund terrorism.


That is a pathetic racist attitude that Xawadiland will refuse to support. Are you the most narrow minded person on the planet, or are there others like you where you come from?
Soltak
01-01-2004, 18:59
The Federation has difficulty believing that one individual can be this stupid. To propose such a thing is absolutely ridiculous and I refuse to support it.

Regarding the previous issue, however, if amended as discussed, the Federation will support IOT.