Vote for Gay Rights Amendment
The following is the Full text of the Proposal, please go and vote for it.
Gay Rights Amendment
A resolution to increase democratic freedoms.
Category: The Furtherment of Democracy Strength: Mild Proposed by: Thracia
Description: On behalf of The Allied States of The Byzantine League, Thracia submits the following proposal:
The Resolution on Gay Rights, accepted on Sat May 3 2003, needs to be amended as follows:
-- The last sentence of this resolution, the one on Gay marriages should change.
-- Each member state should be free to define for itself what is a legaly binding marriage.
-- While the UN can recommend the legalization of gay marriages, it should not impose it on every emeber-state.
Approvals: 6 (Al-Muslimeen, Port Coquitlam, Dovaan, Jontes, Jacordia, The Bulgarite)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 130 more approvals)
Voting Ends: Sat Dec 27 2003
I don't want some hierarchial organization kicking me around.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kûk‡xenisi n!ok‡x'osi xno-k‡xek‡emi.
The state only exists to serve itself.
Racism-the other stupid ideology
Peace, love, and girls with small waists and really big butts!
http://www.sulucas.com/images/steatopygia.jpg
I'm male. Note the pic
of attractive women.
Adriano-Trace will not support the proposal but if it comes to the UN as a Resolution we will support it being that it will have no affect on the our nation since we have no gay "citizens" in our nation and our laws, including the those that protect the civil liberties of our citizens, apply only to our "citizens". :)
Adriano-Trace will not support the proposal but if it comes to the UN as a Resolution we will support it being that it will have no affect on the our nation since we have no gay "citizens" in our nation and our laws, including the those that protect the civil liberties of our citizens, apply only to our "citizens". :)
What do you mean that there is no gay people or that you kill them all :?:
R\ President of the Teracknor Federation
Of course, we vote for this resolution.
Chipland
29-12-2003, 08:40
Only heterosexuals are "citizens" in his imaginary little embodiement of homophobic denial that is his nation. That said, Sigmund Freud theorized those who vociferously express how 'not gay' they are, are in fact often latent homosexuals, and this has been shown to be true in modern psychology research. :)
Reopen the Auswicz for gay peopel :twisted:
Berkylvania
29-12-2003, 18:45
Adriano-Trace will not support the proposal but if it comes to the UN as a Resolution we will support it being that it will have no affect on the our nation since we have no gay "citizens" in our nation and our laws, including the those that protect the civil liberties of our citizens, apply only to our "citizens". :)
What do you mean that there is no gay people or that you kill them all :?:
R\ President of the Teracknor Federation
The ever so interested and shockingly hopeful nation of Berkylvania would like to assume that the nation of Adriano-Trace is implying that their laws apply equally to ALL of their citizens, regardless of sexual orientation. Therefore, a designation of "gay" or "straight" under the law is not needed.
If, however, we are mistaken, and all alternative oriented citizens are executed, then we are shocked and appalled at the barbaric nature of Adriano-Trace.
Hakartopia
29-12-2003, 20:25
Reopen the Auswicz for gay peopel :twisted:
Try not to get your key-board sticky.
The Democratic Republic of Scientific Freedom will support this, if it ever comes to fruition.
Equal Rights are something we should all try to achieve.
The following is the Full text of the Proposal, please go and vote for it.
Gay Rights Amendment
A resolution to increase democratic freedoms.
Category: The Furtherment of Democracy Strength: Mild Proposed by: Thracia
Description: On behalf of The Allied States of The Byzantine League, Thracia submits the following proposal:
The Resolution on Gay Rights, accepted on Sat May 3 2003, needs to be amended as follows:
-- The last sentence of this resolution, the one on Gay marriages should change.
-- Each member state should be free to define for itself what is a legaly binding marriage.
-- While the UN can recommend the legalization of gay marriages, it should not impose it on every emeber-state.
I would be in favor of it only if we'll use "Gay/Lesbian Consortium" instead of marriage where legally gay and lesbian couples are entitled to the same priveledges that heterosexuals and 'try'-sexuals are ruled by.
Approvals: 6 (Al-Muslimeen, Port Coquitlam, Dovaan, Jontes, Jacordia, The Bulgarite)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 130 more approvals)
Voting Ends: Sat Dec 27 2003
The idea of gay marriages is a ridiculous proposition. Heterosexuals have something like 3 or 4 serious relationships in their lives, homosexuals have something like 40 - If about 50% of heterosexual (legal) marriages end in divorce imagine how much that statistic would rise if we legalised homosexual marriages?
sadly there is already a UN Resolution that mandates Homosexual Mariage, and my past attempts to change this have been labled by the monitors of this game as a game mechanics violation.
here is the text of the UN resolution that made gay mariage Law in all UN member nations.
Gay Rights
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.
Category: Human Rights Strength: Strong Proposed by: Kundu
Description: WHEREAS it has been clearly witnessed there is an outspoken minority who wish to oppress gays. We, the People's Republic of Kundu and the other peoples of the world wishing for the preservation of freedom and the respect of all hereby resolve that all member nations of the United Nations must pass laws protecting people from discrimination in all parts of life. We also resolve that gay marriages be protected and endorsed by law in the member nations.
Votes For: 12705
Votes Against: 7734
Implemented: Sat May 3 2003
Neo BrightonBurg
30-12-2003, 08:30
the govt of Imperal Brightonburg will vote no on this bill,this bill pushing a lifestyle upon UN members who disagree on religous grounds.
Janos I
It is my opinion that an amendment to an already passed UN resolution should not be used to attempt to defeat the core principal of what the resolution achieved in this manner.
well sadly it is a game mechanics violation to amend any UN resolution. or at least that is what they told me when I tried to amend one of them.
and Neo BrightonBurg, it does not matter that you dissagree with the UN resolution, by fact that you are a Member of the UN means that it is already law in your Nation, and it is enforce by the UN ministry of Complience.