NationStates Jolt Archive

The Following resolution is on page 22 of the proposals section. I thought I'd post it here too to drum up some support as It's christmas eve and I've wrapped all of my presents. Please go vote for it. Any thoughts would be good.

----------------
Description: For the Sake of Evolution, we propose that all ugly people shall banned from marrying, so as to evolve faster and create a more photogenic world. If we ban the less skilled, picturesque, clever, athletic and talented from reproducing then the characteristics passed onto the next generation shall only be of the best quality. Much the same process has been done to produce racehorses over the past 40 years and it has done wonders.

The Reasons for doing this are for Global Security primarily. There are a huge number of Alien sightings per year, it shall surely not be long till one "Doesn't come in peace". When this time comes we'll need better weapons and better fighters to combat this this threat.

It's your planet you're saving, for the good of the world enforce this resolution. If you dont enforce this, dont blame me when you're a slave to the evil other planets. Oh yeah, and reap the benefits of beautiful people.....
-----------------

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Note the pic in my sig. Every country has a different idea of attractive, in fact, many people have a different idea of attractive.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kûk‡xenisi n!ok‡x'osi xno-k‡xek‡emi.
The state only exists to serve itself.
Racism-the other stupid ideology
Peace, love, and girls with small waists and really big butts!
http://www.sulucas.com/images/steatopygia.jpg
I'm male. Note the pic
of attractive women.

As I agree with you that the view would be a lot nicer to look at. They way you are going at it is wrong. You cannot determine how a person will look or act due to their parents. It is a nature vs. nurture argument. Just because the mom and dad are “attractive” does not mean that the child will inherent the same traits, there is only a better chance. Also, what is considered attractive?

When you said that in racehorses they breed better traits to increase speed or build of a horse. The problem is that if the horse does not have these traits then they kill it off. Would we be allowed to kill humans off because they lost the genetic lottery? Also, do genes even affect the way a person is or how they look?

Maybe something else controls all these things and we have yet to discover it.

Eugenics never works. You know what happened after World War I after many European countries tried to implement policies along these lines or to this effect?
World War II.

Not to imply that this was the only cause of WWII or even a major one, but this proposal, in addition to being tasteless ("ugly" people can contribute nothing to the world merely because of their looks?) and offensive (who are you calling "ugly"? lol), is unoriginal (ref: Nazi Germany) and ineffective (ie: who decides what is "ugly"?).

Women with pencil thin thighs and narrow hips aren't all that physically attractive to me, but they may be to you. Who decides who is right?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kûk‡xenisi n!ok‡x'osi xno-k‡xek‡emi.
The state only exists to serve itself.
Racism-the other stupid ideology
Peace, love, and girls with small waists and really big butts!
http://www.sulucas.com/images/steatopygia.jpg
I'm male. Note the pic
of attractive women.